DankOfAmerica

joined 5 months ago
[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe instead of "winning", y'all could debate to understand. You might even get a better outcome that includes both perspectives.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

You're right. It won't be 90% of the world population, but it would definitely be more than 90% of the countries involved (e.g. NATO, Russia, and China). As far as the world population, people in countries of the southern hemisphere might have more chances at surviving, but with geopolitics changed that drastically with an impossible to resolved food shortage, things could become chaotic pretty quickly. Don't argue with me. Here are the sources I based my opinion on.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

but wat if cat no has air

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sesame Street's finests over here. We doin things right. And we knockin n**gas grandmothas off they fuckin skates, ya heard? Right out of they fuckin socks, ya heard me?

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

But cat neds air

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago

Makes me not wanna close my eyes

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

No, the almanac accounts for the leap second since it was created. It doesn't need to be updated.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

Whatttt the fuckkkkk

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 21 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If Russia or the US launch nuclear weapons, over 90% of the world population will die over the following 10 years. However, global warming would be solved.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yep, still here. How are y'all?

view more: ‹ prev next ›