Euphorazine

It actually happens a lot, but it's not the judge who dismisses it, but the prosecutor's office.

There are plenty of times where the prosecutor pursues bogus charges to intimidate a citizen into taking a plea deal of a lesser charge. And if the citizen fights to go to a jury trial, the prosecutor will drop the charges so it can't go on record that they are clearly acting corruptly to protect their own.

Like this case where a citizen was arrested for calling a cop a dumbass and afterwards the prosecutor attempted to trump up the charges to aggravated assault and then dismissed charges like a week before his jury trial.

Looks like standard MVNO offerings (mint, boost, cricket, fi). $47+tax for talk, text, and data. Though it does look more expensive than others.

So the mobile company is called T1 Mobile. Doesn't that infringe on the trademark of T Mobile? Seems like that would be confusing to a customer. Since it's an MVNO, T1 Mobile is likely piggy backing off of T Mobile's network.

Easy, you import a phone and case, and the "manufacturing" is a worker who puts the case onto the phone and places it in branded packaging, slap a made in America sticker, and there ya go.

If you can't find a girlfriend, become the girlfriend

Often times, I think of movies or stories as the story teller as translating for the audience. You don't watch Troy and think it's odd the characters are speaking English.

It's acceptable to complain if the work is nonfiction and meant to be for education.

When a company sends fake phishing attempts, the links report back if they've been clicked. For them to get that report, their job would had to have sent it.

How else would they know she fell for the bait unless she actually did get phished months ago and their IT traced a recent attack back to her, in which they gave her training instead of firing her?

The immediacy of the follow up email indicates she was caught my a fake phishing attempt meant to catch employees before real attackers do.

It's also the source of "L+ratio", because you had an "L" take (loser take as opposed to a W take) and the ratio is there to "prove" it .

For online discussions, it can be worth it. You might not change the mind of the person you're talking to, but there are more lurkers than posters. Your discussion is for them.

I think if you aren't the one debating, you are more open to differing opinions.

And the question they never ask, is why is there a multi-year wait list? It's like what steam said about piracy. It's not a price issue, it's a service/availability issue.

If undocumented immigrants are a problem, then document them. No need to sneak in if they can just walk through the port of entry and get a job.

I'm fine with them limiting what can be on personalized license plates, they don't even have to offer them. If she got this as a bumper sticker or something, then I don't think the government can force her to remove it.

She's had this plate for 10 years, don't know why they are rejecting her now.

Her plate is "69PWNDU"

So I guess they don't like that over 90% of immigrants return for their court hearing, so if they make it so ICE detains and deport people who return for their hearings, that percentage will go down and it's another propaganda point that catch and release is a failure.