Patents does not have defensive uses, only offensive.
You beat patent trolls by demonstrating you published first.
Natanael
joined 8 months ago
I'd make them prove it, tell me something that happened or was said or seen in the vision that they couldn't have known. Something which can be verified.
Chances are they can't.
Some filters can do that, not all. Gotta check what your filter is rated for!
I'm told sentiment analysis with LLM is a whole thing, but maybe this clever new technology doesn't do what it's promised to do? 🤔
Tldr make it discourage unhealthy use, or else at least be honest in marketing and tell people this tech is a crapshot which probably is lying to you
Excel has conditional logic, HTML does not
*stares at chatgpt* all language is now machine language
With a saving throw?
Probably the only game to be made better by chatgpt
Depends on the rendering engine architecture. If it processes stuff in layers already you can work with that more easily, same if you can insert rules for stuff like different shaders for different object types.
If you're dealing with a game where the rendering engine can't do that it will be very complex regardless of how much source code you have.
You can have multiple layers of detection mechanisms, not just within the LLM the user is talking to
It seems to think you have headphones in, not a speaker
If you're in EU I think you need root to bypass it
Only against practicing entities, and if you have enough cash reserves to deter them with legal expenses.