PhilipTheBucket

joined 1 month ago
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes. The random chemicals that go into these drinks do all kinds of weird bullshit. I have had some that more or less put me to sleep, and when I was consistently drinking canned energy stuff my energetic level was pretty much all over the place.

If you need short-term energy to force your body to burn up some resources that ordinarily it would be saving up (and delay some maintenance depending), then drink caffeine. Some of the crash that you're describing could be aftereffects of that, or it could be some other chemical reaction. Green tea seems like it works pretty clean, coffee is fine in my opinion.

If you need long-term energy, then get consistent exercise, eat enough and a balanced diet, and sleep enough. I know it's easier said than done, but those are the options that will work and not fuck up your health / energy levels over time.

What the fuck, why is NY Post here

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Makes sense. Out of all the possible sounds a wolf can hear, a human voice is probably by far the most likely to kill you if you don't GTFO.

I feel like once these guys get out into the street, it's going to be about 15% of them that really enjoy getting to finally live out their violent fantasies, and about 85% of them that are totally useless cowardly terminally online piles roughly in the mold of Pete Arredondo. Personally, I would really encourage them to use as many of these tactics as possible, and fill ICE up with as much incompetence as they can.

They've killed somewhere on the order of 200,000 people so far, over the course of two years of almost unimaginable brutality. They're showing every indication that they're right on the verge of planning to double that in a very short time with an attack on Gaza City. You're not wrong but also this new thing is a very big deal on its own.

Like a lot of things, it works best when you can't really consciously tell that it's there.

An animation that's too quick to really register is fulfilling the brief and making the interface better, without cluttering up the user's conscious awareness. An animation that wants to slow down enough so that you can really feel that the designer put some work into this interface, and appreciate what genius they are, is no good.

I suspect that she means that Israel should be able to kill Palestinian families if they want to, and anyone who says otherwise is an enemy. Of course, she can't say that specifically, so she has to toss up strawmans about supporting Hamas's war crimes, or just say she "disagrees" without being specific.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is a common framing. "Israel's right to exist" can be used by both sides as a way to reframe somebody into being some kind of monster.

This lady can say that, because some of the people Israel's been genociding are ready to do some genocide back at this point out of pure self preservation, anyone who defends those people in any way must disagree with Israel's "right to exist."

And, on the flip side, people on Lemmy can say that some particular user is a "Zionist" because they don't agree with destroying Israel. They are defending Israel's "right to exist," on stolen land and actively genociding its neighbors, founded as part of a Zionist project, and therefore, they are a "Zionist." I've seen people try to say Bernie Sanders or PugJesus is a Zionist for that reason for example. It's not even really wrong, I guess... anyone who disagrees with destroying Israel completely is, by one way of looking at it, a Zionist. It's just horribly misleading, which is why they like to make the accusation in that particular way.

Honestly I think the way Mamdani handles it is a masterful illustration of how to manage someone trying to paint you into a corner of things you didn't say: Put perspective on the issue they're trying to blow up into the whole conversation, define crystal-clearly what you actually do believe on that issue correcting them on what they tried to put in your mouth, and then forcefully make a case for what you believe and why it's right.

It is a handbook for resistance against a dictatorship, pretty famous among resistance movements worldwide because it was built on actual extensive study of what does and doesn't work in a whole lot of worldwide situations both successful and not.

This talks more about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_Dictatorship_to_Democracy

It is also here: https://archive.org/details/from_dictatorship_to_democracy_1306_librivox

If it makes you feel any better, they have done this before. And this time the people in charge are idiots. Look up Black Wall Street, the firebombing of MOVE headquarters, killing of Fred Hampton, all that stuff. This is not new. It used to be this way a lot of the time. It's just in a new form now, more systematic, with a ton of extra strengths and a few new weaknesses, compared to the way it came before. It's like Pennywise. I have no idea how this time will shake out, I am afraid a little bit. But it is beatable. My concern is actually a lot more about what is going to come after, than it is that all this shit show in its current setup is indestructible.

https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/126900/8008_FDTD.pdf

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Still works for me. Are you on Tor / VPN?

 

Across the globe, zoonotic and vector-borne diseases (ZVBDs), illnesses that jump from animals to humans, either through direct contact or via carriers such as mosquitoes, have increased significantly over the past few decades, claiming millions of lives each year. Now, the spotlight for this is on the Amazon rainforest.

Amazon rainforest: infectious diseases surging

An estimated 75% of all newly emerging infectious diseases, along with more than 60% of all human pathogens, are spread from animals.

Mosquito-borne diseases alone put more than 80% of the global population at risk. Their spread threatens not only public health, but also the world economy.

Even before coronavirus shut down, economies and filled hospitals, emerging infectious diseases were costing the world over $1tn a year. The pandemic made those costs painfully visible, but did not create the problem, it exposed it.

Since 2003, outbreaks and pandemics have taken more than 15 million lives and drained approximately $4tn from the global economy.

A study published in One Earth, a sustainability journal from Cell Press, warns that this crisis is no accident. Deforestation, the climate crisis, and environmental degradation are creating the perfect storm for pathogens to thrive and spread.

The lead author of the study, Raquel L. Carvalho, warns about the risks in Europe associated with vector-borne diseases:

Europe is increasingly becoming a favourable environment for mosquito-borne diseases, as prolonged summers, elevated temperatures, and heavier rainfall create conditions in which mosquito populations can establish and spread in regions where they had previously been unable to survive.

Deforestation driving the emergence of the next pandemic

Since the 1940s, changes in how humans use land, cutting down forests, expanding agribusiness, and pushing deeper into wild areas, have been linked to more than one-third of all new infectious diseases.

The climate crisis is creating conditions where mosquitoes, ticks, and pathogens flourish. Rising temperatures extend mosquito breeding seasons and allow disease-carrying insects to spread into places where winters once kept them at bay.

Meanwhile, deforestation and land-use changes bring humans into closer contact with wild animals, increasing the odds of a spillover event. Poverty and weak healthcare systems magnify the danger, turning exposure into tragedy.

According to a study published in the International Journal of Emergency Medicine, climate change is also disrupting food production and supply, creating conditions that allow harmful microbes and toxins to thrive, while extreme weather and rising temperatures increase the risk of foodborne illnesses, such as Salmonella and E. coli.

Diseases, viruses, bacteria: out of control

Recently, we’ve seen a sharp increase in the spread of diseases caused by parasites, viruses and bacteria, including dengue, Zika, chikungunya, oropouche, malaria, Lyme disease, among others.

The spread of oropouche fever, transmitted by the tiny culicoides paraensis mosquito, popularly called maruim, is another alarming sign.

According to the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO), in 2025, 12,786 confirmed oropouche cases were reported in the Americas region, including over 11,888 cases in Brazil.

In Brazil, oropouche outbreaks originated in the AMACRO region (a deforestation hotspot named after the states of Amazonas, Acre, and Rondônia) and have already spread across the country to the state of Espírito Santo, with 6,322 recorded cases in 2025, and across the world.

The Amazon rainforest is considered one of the world’s largest reservoirs of zoonotic diseases. Many scientists have repeatedly cautioned that environmental disruptions are driving the rise of infectious diseases and have highlighted the imminent risk of a lethal pathogen originating from the region.

Joel Henrique Ellwanger, biologist and researcher at the department of genetics at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), said:

Climate change will trigger important ecological changes in the Amazon, many of them with the potential to reduce its biodiversity, facilitating the spread of known disease vectors and increasing the chances of new diseases emerging.

Putting communities at risk

A study, conducted by Raquel L. Carvalho, professor at the University of São Paulo (USP), and her team, analysed 312 papers that addressed 39 different diseases in 79 countries. Much of this work focuses on the pathogens themselves or the insects and animals that transmit them. In contrast, far fewer studies consider who’s exposed or why some groups are more vulnerable once exposed.

Carvalho highlighted gaps in existing research:

Only 7.4% of the studies looked at the full picture: hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. Studying where mosquitoes live might show potential danger, but it doesn’t reveal who is most at risk, or why certain communities are more likely to fall ill.

Diseases like dengue fever, the West Nile virus, and leptospirosis thrive not only because mosquitoes and rodents are abundant, but also because people live in poor housing without proper sanitation, or because climate change drives mosquitoes into new regions.

If these human and environmental factors are ignored, predictions of where and when outbreaks will happen will always likely fail.

Most studies carried out come from the United States, China, and Europe, while tropical regions, where the risks of diseases are greatest, remain under-studied. Brazil and Kenya stand out as exceptions, but vast regions of Africa, South America, and Asia are left with little attention.

The places most likely to produce the next pandemic are also the least prepared to prevent it.

Building a better response

The researchers of the study explained that prevention requires a more complete picture of the risks, meaning the combination of ecological data with human and social realities.

Poverty, education, housing, and access to healthcare are as important as climate change and land use.

For example, in East Africa, malaria was mapped out more effectively when researchers combined mosquito data with measures of poverty and healthcare. In New York, Lyme disease predictions improved when scientists considered both tick abundance and human behaviour. Understanding hazard, exposure, and vulnerability together gives us tools for prevention.

Carvalho pointed out that tackling the threat won’t be easy, but insists that stronger monitoring and international cooperation are key:

It’s clear that there’s no obvious solution, but stronger surveillance systems, especially in disease hotspots, can act as an early-warning radar.

Cross-border scientific cooperation can ensure that no region is left behind. Additionally, a One Health approach, recognising that human, animal, and environmental health are interconnected, must guide every decision.

Communities living in poverty, the ones closest to the frontlines of environmental change, are the first to suffer. If we continue to ignore the full complexity of disease risk, we condemn these vulnerable populations to pay a high cost, while leaving the rest of the world exposed.

The coronavirus pandemic taught us a lesson, showed us the cost of being unprepared. The next pandemic could be much worse, driven by climate extremes and ecological disruption.

The line between environmental neglect and human suffering is very thin. It shouldn’t be hard to understand that our health depends on the health of our planet, one protects the other.

Feature image via ABC News/Youtube.

By Monica Piccinini

 

On September 27 and 28 in Lima, Peru, police violently attacked protesters demanding an end to corruption, greater security, an end to extortion by criminal groups, and the end of Dina Boluarte’s government in general.

Boluarte was the vice president of Pedro Castillo, who was removed from office in what many have called a “coup d’état”.

After that, Boluarte led a government that harshly repressed protesters demanding the return of Castillo. Nearly 60 deaths were recorded during the protests that lasted for months between 2022 and 2023.

Harsh repression in Lima

Early on September 27, transport workers announced a 48-hour strike and closed several roads in the north of the capital. They then joined protests in downtown Lima led by young people, which ended in clashes with the police.

It appears that the executive branch has decided to continue its heavy-handed approach rather than engage with protesters’ demands. According to some figures, around 74 people were injured during the protests this past weekend. Among them were 26 journalists and nine reporters who were covering the events.

This was reported by the National Association of Journalists of Peru, which denounced that the police attacked journalists who were reporting on the repression against thousands of protesters by pushing them and using tear gas. In fact, a video shows how journalist Victor Castillo was pushed by the police. Once the police had dispersed several journalists to the vicinity of the Rimac River, they prevented them from moving freely around the city.

In this regard, the Foreign Press Association in Peru expressed concern about the attacks against journalists; according to the organization, rubber bullets were also used against journalists.

Taking these and other complaints into account, the National Human Rights Coordinator reported: “During the day of social protest on September 27, we recorded 18 people injured, including a journalist and a brigade member. We condemn police repression and demand an end to the attacks. We urge the Human Rights Prosecutor’s Office, the Public Prosecutor’s Office, and the Attorney General’s Office of Peru to ensure the safety of citizens exercising their right to protest. Considering the demonstration called for tomorrow, Sunday, September 28, it is urgent that guarantees be put in place to ensure a safe protest. Protesting is a right, not a crime.

Who are they and why are they protesting?

The protesters have been dubbed “Generation Z”, meaning those born between the late 1990s and 2010, especially students who initially marched to protest pension system reforms.

However, the demonstrations have been joined by various sectors. One of them who joined the protests last weekend was transport workers, who have repeatedly demanded that the executive branch act efficiently to stop extortion by organized crime and corruption.

As experts have pointed out, the protests are increasingly taking on an anti-government tone, especially against President Boluarte and Congress, who, according to the latest polls, are currently facing almost universal rejection.

In other words, the protesters are more than just young people, and they are protesting about more than just specific measures.

In fact, there seems to be a widespread feeling of discontent, as social movement expert Omar Coronel told the BBC: “There is widespread rejection of President Boluarte and her allies in Congress due to the growing authoritarianism that has been imposed in Peru.”

view more: ‹ prev next ›