SiliconAvatar

joined 2 months ago

Something rotten at the core of Starfleet? Surely not...! 🤣

It's an old chestnut, and well overdone by now, but the real question is whether they can give it a new spin, or simply make it work better than, say, in "Into darkness".

At least they're not pulling known characters out of mothballs for this, so I remain optimistic.

Oh, the XenoGorn? Gornomorph? Let's workshop that name a bit.

Difference is, there were straightfaced Star trek series airing when Lower Decks started. Now, the only show running (well, there's Academy as well) is doing high camp every week.

But they definitely do a lot of genre play, and recent interviews with the showrunners indicate that it's completely intentional, and unlikely to change any time soon.

It's certainly intentional, I just wish they'd keep their hands on the wheel instead of following every inane impulse that crosses their mind.

As for changing, well — the show is going to end after next season, so there's a very definite change.

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 13 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Perhaps, if every other episode wasn't already a gimmick genre swap. Trelane and/or Q worked fine in plain science fiction where they were the wacky trickster element in and of themselves.

I'd really prefer this show to take a chill pill and focus on telling solid stories rather than doing cleverpants narrative gymnastics.

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 15 points 5 days ago (14 children)

Soap Opera episode

WTAF. Enough with the damn genre exercises already.

Neat red vinyl there 🤩

Hold up now, that's Galaxy quest erasure! 🤣

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 2 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Didn't you read the press release? It says "classic Star Trek" specifically 😅

I'm very careful reading those threads to avoid spoilers, because my partner and I will only be watching once the entire season is available. That said, a Dr Giger callback in any way, shape or form is the most promising thing I've heard about s4 so far 😂

 

It only took forever (well, from May until now) for this vinyl to become available in my local b&m record store... But holy hell, is it worth the wait! 🤘🤩

https://neurosis.bandcamp.com/album/an-undying-love-for-a-burning-world

Well, same voice actor. He's done quite a bit of extended universe things, but on screen (if that's the right term) he's been on the show 1975, 2006, and 2025. That's some staying power...

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I remember feeling truly unsettled watching this for the first time. For one thing, the Doctor and Rose strands without the TARDIS — on a planetoid that really has no business hanging so close to a black hole. A small world teetering on the edge of certain and utter destruction, while the population assure themselves "we don't know how this works, but it'll be fine". And they rely on a race of "willing" slaves to do menial support chores. Perfect metaphor for Western civilisation, really.

But add to that the occult-tinged threat of the presence, voiced by Sutekh himself, Gabriel Woolf, that possesses the Ood and Toby. There are decidedly Lovecraftian themes at play here that sit really uncomfortably in a Doctor Who story, certainly in 2006. Of course the inferior, "mindless" slaves are affected, like racist old HPL would like to imagine, but the real trespass is the corruption of a white researcher who studies eldritch knowledge and is taken over by primal forces (probably sexuality).

Up to now, the modern show has thrown ghosts, werewolves, and walking dead at us, with a comforting "—but it's aliens" twist to moor it in (light) science fiction. Here, like with the physical situations of the castaway Doctor and the impossible planet, there is no safety net to keep the storyline from plunging into superstitious darkness. It's like Event horizon, barely adapted for a family audience.

So this is a solid first-of-two episode with high stakes on several levels; as high as one can expect in a show where you sort of know they'll be okay at the end. The guest cast do a great job of presenting a convincing, everyday work situation. Everybody is weary and a bit jaded — even Ida opening the dome to reveal the black hole comes with a tired sigh as if to say, "oh sure, I'll show off that old thing again" — but you get the impression they've worked together for a while.

As first halves go, this has to be top shelf for modern Who. The followup — let's talk about that next week, don't want to ruin the good mood in advance.

 

Chris Chibnall:

“I think the biggest thing you can say about all of that is it’s very easy to miss the point ‒ that this is primarily about money.”

“It’s not really about all of the things that everybody is banging on about and moaning about or what or getting emotional about.”

 

When I click an external link from inside the app, Blorp replicates appears to open a new instance of my default browser, including all of its current tabs. It's slightly confusing because closing the tab I opened from some thread means I now have two identical browsers open, but one of them is Blorp 😉

I realise I'm just supposed to hit the back button to be returned to the app UI, but I'm new to Blorp and very familiar with my browser. You see how habits win out over what I rationally know I should do...

Did I miss some setting to open links in an internal, single tab browser instead?

 

Carole Ann Ford, who played the Doctor's granddaughter Susan in the early seasons of the show, and cameoed again in the most recent series, offers her thoughts on the current hiatus.

She's a cheerful lady, but it's hard not to read some disappointment between the lines that her historical return to the show was all but cut, with slim chances for a do-over. Ford turned 86 on 16 June.

 

BBC director-general Matt Brittin has announced that 550 of the planned 1,800 to 2,000 job cuts at the corporation will be taken from BBC News and TV and radio-related roles.

The 57-year-old has also announced the BBC is to axe programmes and cut content spending by £80 million, and added it would “review our broadcast TV channels and radio network portfolio” as more of its audience moves online, while attempting to sustain “output” and “audience value and impact”.

The BBC has not indicated which programmes would be axed under the plans.

[…]

In response to the announcement, head of media and entertainment union, Bectu, Philippa Childs, said it is “far from ideal” that the cuts are taking place at the same time as the BBC’s charter renewal.

She said: “I’m not sure how you can make informed decisions about the long-term future of the organisation when it will be in a substantially diminished place at the end of the process than the beginning.

[…]

“The charter renewal must put the BBC’s funding on a secure, long-term pathway or it risks death by a thousand cuts.”

So that's fairly dire for anybody hoping the BBC can shoulder a show like Doctor Who without substantial external funding.

 

Big caveat up front, I have no illusion that this was ever planned out, or that it's ever going to be made. I just connected some dots from Eccleston's season to our current mess. I do think that if the BBC had Pete McTighe make a 15 minute special along these lines and put it on Youtube, the fans could rest easier and the next production team might start on a blank slate.

To summarise, the last couple of seasons had a convoluted arc concerning a companion's parent issues. She was saved as a baby through time travel intervention, but not without a lot of temporal disturbance in the process. In fact, babies have been a throughline in both Ncuti Gatwa's seasons, a pattern that culminates in the Doctor rupturing the Time Vortex in order to save one child's existence. For just a probable moment there, that child is his own. Succeeding in his mission, the Doctor is then replaced by somebody looking suspiciously like Rose Tyler.

  • Church.
  • Baby.
  • Rose.
  • Temporal paradox.
  • On what could be considered the Doctor's Father's Day.

Bring on the Time Reapers to sterilise the wound in time! That's why the Doctor regenerated into this face, à la 12 looking like Caecilius from "The fires of Pompeii". She needs to channel Rose as a catalyst to heal the reset 15 did to save Poppy. Besides, where Pete sacrificed himself to sort the timestream out, this time around the Reapers are attacking the Doctor and their police box. And the Doctor's current face has a very special relation to the TARDIS' living heart.

To be fair, the rest of the story doesn't really matter, this is only meant to resolve the Billie Piper twist of "The reality war". It doesn't fix fan quibbles over the Timeless Child or the Doctor being half human on their mother's side for a hot minute in 1996. Pretty much everything other than that latest regeneration cliffhanger can be ignored or picked up upon by future writers. So end this minisode on a regeneration without showing what happens next, or just leave it open ended.

Now, would I love for Susan to pop up for no other reason than to ease her "grandfather" into the credits crawl, and a future season where neither actress are seen again? Maybe an exchange to echo the Seventh's exit monologue to Ace at the end of "Survival"? Absolutely, but this could well be a one hander between Piper, some 2005 archive footage, and the janky old low-poly CGI monsters from back then.

[made a few edits for clarity(?)]

view more: next ›