this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek Social Club

15260 readers
56 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
09-03 SNW 4x07 “Like Chronitons Through the Hourglass”
09-10 SNW 4x08 “Orders of Magnitude”
09-17 SNW 4x09 "Once La’An a Time"
09-24 SNW 4x10 "Tomorrow's Enterprise"
TBA SFA 2x01 TBA

Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.

Allied Discord Server


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 58 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I like Star Trek because it's optimistic. I want to see competent, emotionally mature, people solving problems by working together.

If I want to see bad apples I can look outside.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 20 points 5 days ago

Not just optimistic competence porn (which I like), but IMO hopeful. The original iterations actually inspired hope for a better future, something sorely lacking today and precious.

Reading 'Tease "Dark"' in the headline is an immediate turn off.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sisko was never glorifying being dark. In the pale moonlight is a fantastic episode, but I don't remember it glorifying the darkness.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't know if it's glorifying anything, but the man bombs planets on star trek as a part of the federation.

It's hardly picard fighting for the rights of the nanobots eating the ship

[–] crimson_iris@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago

A Federation officer can make a planet uninhabitable as a treat.

The good news is, the word "glorify" does not appear in this article.

[–] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 days ago

This is sad. The reason I'm going back and watching classic Trek is because I'm tired of every show needing to be dark and gritty!

[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wasn't the big complaint against Star Trek: Section 31 was that people didn't want to watch Corrupt Space CIA? And don't people enjoy SNW and Lower Decks because they embrace the lighter side of Trek?

Honestly I think most Trek movies have tried to get dark and it never lands for me.

Wasn’t the big complaint against Star Trek: Section 31 was that people didn’t want to watch Corrupt Space CIA?

I think the much bigger complaints are that it was boring, derivative, and had nothing to say?

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

American culture never recovered from the grimdark post-9/11 era of the 2000s. They had to tell themselves everyone has a dark side, even the purest heroes, in order to justify systemic killing and torture in the name of The War on Terror(TM).

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They really are determined to undermine Star Trek.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"...while this [script] isn’t a cynical or nihilistic take on it, I think it does acknowledge that there are some bad apples in every institution that can have a strong voice and can really make an impact on that institution and everything it stands for.”

How could they possibly think this is relevant subject matter in the year 2026?

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A corrupt Admiral then? These writers must be real fans busting out this Star Trek classic lol

playing the hits

[–] billmason@startrek.website 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I will always reserve judgment until seeing it (taking the hypothetical stance that this actually gets made), but it's not an exciting description of a Star Trek project (to me).

Yeah, I mean it's barely a description at all - we're surviving on scraps over here.

[–] themoken@startrek.website 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

“Two movies we cite as comps for what we’re hoping to do are Training Day and Crimson Tide,” Goldstein tells Inverse.

Hmm, I like both of those movies but way different vibes. Crimson Tide might as well already be a Trek script, but Training Day? Freshly minted Captain versus effective but corrupt badmiral perhaps? XO and captain maybe?

My hopes this will be made are pretty low, but there could be some good Trek here. Especially if they actually made a movie that wasn't a cameo fest (it does say all new characters).

I haven't actually seen "Training Day," but I suppose both films have entrenched authority figures with outdated and/or corrupt ideas of How Things Are Done, and younger subordinates who have to walk through the ethical minefield that's been laid.

And I agree, that could be good Trek.

Something rotten at the core of Starfleet? Surely not...! 🤣

It's an old chestnut, and well overdone by now, but the real question is whether they can give it a new spin, or simply make it work better than, say, in "Into darkness".

At least they're not pulling known characters out of mothballs for this, so I remain optimistic.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

If they wanted to go all in on making Starfleet the bad guy, I'd be all for it. Showing that the Federation's ideals can overcome and dismantle even the Federation's largest and most ingrained institutions when they go sour would be about the most hopeful thing the franchise could do right now.

But this just sounds like another badmiral situation, nothing ground breaking.