Tarquinn2049

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As in the best places to shoot... right? /s

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That makes a lot of sense. I've always kind of enjoyed the kirby games, but they feel a little lacking in direction and challenge.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Possibly, I'd have to see if they can be taken apart. From memory, I don't recall exactly what the handle fastener looked like, but it seemed like an unadjustable system.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That doesn't look like a safety can opener, the ones that cut the side of the rim? Looks like the old style, like a swingline or something.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Thank you, hopefully it won't be a long wait after.

 

I assume they are two separate patents by two separate companies, but once those are both on the same can opener, there will be no reason to buy any other manual can opener. So when is the first one expiring?

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For a second, I thought that said Arkham, it made more sense that way.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, this line of posts I would consider completely separate from the other one. Though not completely in a vacuum.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh, I wasn't like being mad or anything. I was just trying to explain what was happening. I'm autistic, so not only have I already learned all these lessons the hard way, but I'm very familiar with being misunderstood and having to make extra effort to explain my jokes.

Edit: And with the most common way of browsing lemmy, especially as a new user, being to have it set to /all, there are actually alot of instances of a random person showing up with a super unpopular hot take on something they don't know about.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If you want to play a person that would get downvoted, without indicating that you are doing so, you are then not in a position to be upset that you got downvoted. Acting irrational and defending the indefensible is a normal thing to encounter on the internet, unironically.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Nobody knows who you are. And nobody can read the words the way they sound in your head. So if you type exactly what someone that is wrong would type, with no indication that you are doing so ironically, how exactly are people to know that -you- would never say that unironically. There are people that would, and their post would look the exact same.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They did give her a lesser sentence.

Most people don't have those thoughts in their head in the first place, and thus don't have to control themselves from posting them at an emotional time.

Calling specific people to commit specific violent actions against specific targets is very much a crime. If it was just a vague "this thing was bad, I am sad" post, there wouldn't have been a problem, even if one of her followers took it upon themselves to do something. But with her specifically saying exactly which buildings her followers should burn down, it's a problem even if they don't then do so.

With all that, I don't know if your post was serious or sarcastic, so hopefully I'm not getting whooshed. But very much, this is not a role model. Her serving a short prison sentence for what she did will be a better behaviour model to her kids than her getting away with that would have been. And hopefully it will help her work towards being a role model in the future.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The point is that both those statements are the same thing.

view more: next ›