bitfucker

joined 2 years ago
[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On the basis of technicality, it will depend very wildly on the ToC of said intellectual property. As you said, GOG just distributes the installer and that is it, the IP holder can technically revoke your/GOG license if that is in the ToC somewhere.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Now that you mention 3.5%, yeah I can see how 30% is a bit much

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

C# is C++ and another ++ on top of the existing ++

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

The redneck engineering equivalent in CS

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

You jest but it can happen when what the docs says doesn't reflect the implementation. And also, that's what we call bugs.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, is this the same guy that gives the commencement speech "I wish you bad luck"? I quite liked that speech but not so on this decision.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

The problem from the article is that the GPL was violated and somewhere downstream the user demanded they fix something to upstream. Being that downstream has modification without being published (my assumption on the GPL violation, either found due to inconsistent bug reproduction or other), the author is understandably upset.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's for a printer but the article is SSD?

Edit: you got the year wrong

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nothing comes to mind. DRM literally means digital rights management and unless you wanted to be petty, like blocking a certain person from using your app, then DRM for something free is not something that I can think of a use case for.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Enforcing payment comes to mind without resorting to in-app purchase or any account creation. A lot of desktop software is a good example of those. Sure, you can still have cracks and whatnot, but then again, that's not the point. Might as well ask what is the point of Denuvo. That is a whole other discussion.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's my point. Android "doesn't" have to use Google Play Store, but it is convenient. Other store fronts exist like F-droid and many vendor specific one. Google just provide the DRM mechanism like steam does provide DRM via steamworks

view more: ‹ prev next ›