bitfucker

Iirc, the requirement is basically a computing device than runs using AMD processor (I forgot about the GPU part, but maybe it must be AMD too), and uses NVME SSD. So, most modern system?

No.

MIT : "Here is my project. Do whatever, I don't care. Just put my name in a credit somewhere."

GPL (assuming FSF stance on linking is used) : "Here is my project. Oh, you want to use my project and distribute your project that uses my project? Make your whole project open source too."

BSD-3 : "Here is my project. Credit me and do whatever but, don't use my name to promote your usage."

And many more nuances on other licenses like patents and whatnot. The problem is, the average person does not care to enforce it.

Does that term come from linguistics? I'd like to learn more about it

Isn't the term already exists now? Executive Dysfunction

Yes, sounds about right. For general purpose decoupling that is a good value. Make sure to place it as close to the IC as possible. A longer path will add more "noise" to the system. Do read more about the capacitor type too since it can matter a lot. I suggest looking at Phil's Lab video on YouTube to learn more about this stuff

Oh no... Is there no alternative as of now? (I use J2K)

I think it would be wack for word processor application. Office work will never get boring anymore

So this is the full version huh

Uhh, yes it did? CPU time costs money too. What used to take milliseconds now takes a seconds WILL cost them money. And usually CPU time is the most expensive one too while bandwidth is cheap.

I was looking for this comment. I knew someone from Lemmy would have seen that

Is copyleft a requirement for FOSS?

Or maybe people don't care about what their project looks like after releasing it?

P1 : Hey, I've used your code in my company project! P2 : Cool. I've got another job to do.

End