jonne

joined 2 years ago
[–] jonne 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Obamacare was the right wing plan. It's been a huge giveaway to the insurance industry, and in the end the US did get the death panels Sarah Palin talked about, except instead of government bureaucrats it's some AI run by an insurer that's accountable to nobody.

The democrats need to finally give Medicare for all a shot, as the current system has middlemen skimming profits off at every step without adding any value.

[–] jonne 62 points 1 month ago

It's those radical left private equity firms!

[–] jonne 5 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah, of course, but it feels like it's never part of the conversation, even among people whose opinions I respect and are, for example, super critical of AI and talking about enshittification and other issues in the online sphere, they never seem to take the step to check out Linux, or get off Twitter or whatever.

[–] jonne 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah, very disappointed by RMS' creepiness (the Epstein stuff isn't the only thing), but he was 100% right about software freedom.

[–] jonne 44 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I can see Microsoft moving to the same sort of thinking as well. Apple already made Mac OS users jump through hoops when you want to install something from the internet or even through a third party package manager like homebrew.

[–] jonne 61 points 1 month ago (14 children)

And the open source movement is such a blind spot to the 'left' as well, even though technology freedom is critical if you want to be able to organise any type of resistance in the digital space.

Lemmy users largely get it, obviously, but centre left people will happily let themselves get locked into the Apple/Google walled gardens even though you're just giving that company a ridiculous amount of power over you.

[–] jonne 50 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Yeah, those people that think having a businessman running the country would be better are either business owners themselves, or have never actually worked in a business.

[–] jonne 2 points 1 month ago

Congress has cameras. If you're lying to Congress about factual things, your memory of the event shouldn't matter.

[–] jonne 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, that's literally a change some states made in response to the Weinstein scandal. If it's reasonable to assume the truth isn't going to come out before the statute runs out, I'm definitely in favour of making it longer. It should probably still exist, but 5 years seems very short for serious crimes, especially considering how slow the justice system works.

[–] jonne 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Democrats should definitely take something from that playbook, but there's been many cases of someone lying in front of Congress and not facing consequences. It happened in the leadup of both Iraq wars, and I don't think people should just be allowed to get away with stuff like that just because the clock ran out.

Obviously part of the problem is that Democrats don't seem to be interested in prosecuting stuff like that in the name of bipartisanship, but that's how they got where they got now.

[–] jonne 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The problem is that the DOJ isn't as independent as people would like it to be, so you basically need a change in administration to hold someone to account, which could take longer than 5 years.

[–] jonne 32 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I know these particular charges are probably bullshit, but I don't think there should be a statute of limitations for lying to Congress.

view more: ‹ prev next ›