I do not.
See my other response to your pre-edit comment.
I do not.
See my other response to your pre-edit comment.
How about this, this is a real easy one. What type of function is this:
There is a theorem that "all smooth functions are locally linear". In other words, most "normal" functions are indistinguishable from a straight line on the graph if you zoom in far enough.
So that's not just not an easy one, it is an impossible one.
Or you can just admit you dont have any data to quantify your assertion that AI advancement is exponential growth.
Ah, that's a fair argument. LLMs growing exponentially is just an assertion being made and we're supposed to believe that then the steep growth must be just around the corner.
But all over this post you've got heavily downvoted comments that sound like you are misunderstanding exponential functions rather than doubting that they're the right model for this.
We might be on the steep part of an S function right now.
Fuck. Is anyone in Europe working on a vaccine? Once the 'muricans have incubated the mammalian version of this virus, we're going to need it. What's BioNTech doing? Its mostly their tech anyway.
Portugal
Is this the obvious counter example we've been waiting for to finally disprove Betteridge's law of headlines?
Great. Now I've got that stuck in my head.
What decade are we talking about here?
No thanks, we don't want Elon
People have advanced from not reading the article to not reading the excerpt in the post. Quite impressive really.
Say 50.1% of the population vote to leave so it's on, then some people change their minds or some people die while others turn 18, then it's 49.9% who want independence so it's off.
Thats exactly how it went with Brexit, except that they still went through with it.
Why are we even recording that?