michaelmrose

Why would that be so.

Any investment has risks. On average real estate taxes are overwhelmingly taxes on real gains that are actually both enjoyed and eventually realized often without a commensurate tax rate especially when they are given to descendants and the value is "reset" to the level it was received and all those gains magically poof and cease even being capital gains.

A tax payer funded remission when the market drops would be full on pants on head crazy for so many reasons. It would encourage stupid risk on the basis that it would be subsidized by the government, it would be paid by everyone but overwhelmingly enjoyed by the rich, and it would oft represent fake losses. For instance collecting 10,000 for 5 years on a 1M property then remitting 25k back largely to the 1% who overwhelmingly own the country then oops it recovers its value after the crash!

Real permanent loss of value in consumer real estate is rare and impossible to sanely effectively insure against. Fortunately it is a fucking fake problem.

It is highly weird to see a bunch of people in the top 10% whining about the only real way they remotely pay their share.

literally everyone has agency.

Yes buddy I did adopt from the shelter I was volunteering at. In order to adopt you have to agree that the cat will not be allowed to roam outdoors because they don't want to adopt to morons.

This happened and our cat was actually in the space between the screen door and the exterior door. Also sleeping in the closet

I do already so I don't need to avoid doing because I already do even though the nature of my effect on the world is the sum of my behavior and I'm really bad at logic.

So I live in an apartment which by virtue of going up uses far less space, I keep my cats indoors and take them on walks outside, and I didn't create a bunch of kids and instead chose to raise one that already existed. You can always do more.

You can use netting to keep them off or your garden or just grow enough to have enough after they need or both

It's a form of nonsense argument where instead of addressing the actual point someone points at something worse and implies that if we can't stop insert worse thing we somehow needn't worry about insert less worse thing. In actuality presumably they have an outdoor cat and are contributing to the problem and just want to justify it.

This is bullshit logic. We as adult humans already exist and have little choice about national housing policy. We can however choose not to contribute to suburban sprawl OR murder cats roaming the neighborhood whacking the wildlife. We can also choose not to have 12 children who will need space too. Not being able to do everything is a poor reason not to do anything.

Your particular circumstances are why YOUR particular 15 year old cat is great hanging in his own yard. It is not an argument in general even that SOME cats ought to be outdoor because they are overwhelmingly get killed and kill out there.

Your argument is so inapplicable to almost anyone else that its like saying your former ax murderer friend is totally safe because he's taken up Buddhism and non-violence and is now mostly crippled.

Humans are dangerous wildlife not least because of our cars. That is why indoor cats live 10-20 years and outdoor cats 2-4

We cause it both by building over all the habitat AND by letting cats loose. Since I have to live somewhere I won't feel bad about existing but I' also won't be letting my cat out to make it worse. That said that is 99.9% because outdoor cats normally live 2-4 years and indoor cats live 10-20 years. May cat gets to go outside in a strolller/harness and otherwise gets to roam our floor of the apartment.