pebbles
Huge if true. No one has ever tried making a log out button before.
Yo they look so lumpy. I never see fellas as lumpy as this.
Well they get to use my friends social inertia against me. Hard to move off of snap even if I wanted to and so they can just change the TOS and get my data.
But they don't have to do it that way.
It could be a pretty bomb model though.
Oh cool, thanks for sharing! Biofilm is exactly where I tend to find them. I think they need a decent bit of oxygen, and if there is algae then they'll eat the bacteria attracted to algae's oxygen.
My most stentor populated samples were pond samples with a good bit of dirt and leaves that I sat on a shelf for a few days.
Once they've sat you'll see a film start to form at the top that wasn't there before. For me that film was made of really long bacteria all tangled together and tons of other life attached to and living around it.
This video doesn't have stentors, but it is of my thickest biofilm, a lot of stentors were found in the same sample: https://youtu.be/T3Bbg-ObTok
Good luck microbe hunting!
I never watch Doctor Who, but I know the last human when I see them.
Man this is really getting into the weeds. I don't have those histories in my head well enough to talk about specifics like that. (Though I do appreciate all that you wrote. It is interesting to read.)
If you're an anarchist, I cannot imagine how a western religious institution propping up a fascist regime's military dicatorship over half the old nation's territory benefits you in any way.
Me either.
I'm pretty sure the main focus is just about the abstract idea of a group wanting to leave a larger group.
How on earth does this benefit any kind of anarchist cause?
Secession is anarchist in the sense that it rejects and fractures a dominant power in favor of one that better represents folks. So not full anarchist, but definitely more in that anarchist than restricting that ability.
Secession is a tool. Of course there are going to be bad examples, but that doesn't mean it's never justified and never a good way forward.
What if you had just been annexed? Not allowed to try and leave?
Really?!? Maybe you are keeping your samples healthier lol. I think they are decomposers and show up in my samples that are starting to decay lol.
I would not call splitting the baby progress.
Not when you put it like that! Lol
Vietnam, for instance, wasn't liberated through division. It had to be reunited before either half was free from civil war. Same with Germany. Or Korea, for that matter.
In those instances splitting may have been an important step forward even if it wasn't the final step. (I don't remember the context that well for those examples) (I looked it up, at least in Vietnam, idk how you expected them to go forward without splitting given all of the external pressure.)
I think the world will always be in flux. Do you think we'll eventually just have a static set of countries with static borders and all of the people will be happy? If so, I'd love to hear why. If not, then by what actions do you suppose those nations change to deal with ever evolving groups, environment, genes, etc? Why would secession be particularly worse than other options?
For example, I'm not so sure the legitimacy of North Korea is affirmed by the existence of south Korea more than it is affirmed by their allies (China, Russia, etc). Why would we focus on South Korea seceding more than other countries supporting?
I really appreciate your tone. A lot of folks are (reasonably) offended with the framing.
I'm curious how those debates went. I see the utility of the union, but we've definitely also seen the tyranny of it. You definitely wouldn't get the states to become the union if they were all split right now.
What proportion of Texan's incarcerated population is forced to labour for next to no salary again?
This would be my first time actually.
Hint: no.
I always appreciate the hints.
Slavery is alive and well in the USA, and Texas is one of its largest users thereof now. So yes, I think the average modern Texan secessionist would be pro-slavery … because they already are.
Yeah I didn't really consider their prison population, solid point. Prison slavary is bad. Though I think it is good to note scale differences. Both are bad, it's just that slavery was much much worse in the past.
According to https://userpages.umbc.edu/~bouton/History407/SlaveStats.htm
During slavery in the US about 1/3 of folks in the south were slaves. Compared to the 0.4% of today in Texas that's pretty staggering.
So yeah, I'd go far enough to say that the average Texan isn't pro-slavery in the sense that immediately hits my mind. Enough belive prison labor though, so you can't say the aren't pro slavery.