Infinite money glitch
potoo22
For the love of God, please use a shoehorn if you are still having this problem.
If you make a redstone PC and don't consider the requirements to run Minecraft... Probably (in-world it wouldn't be using electricity)
For anyone unfamiliar, that's the Anarcho-capitalism flag. It's basically libertarianism, the biggest difference is that they call themselves anarcho-capitalist instead of libertarians. Maybe because the American libertarian party is bat-shit crazy, and I can see not wanting to be associated with that despite having similar beliefs.
It's not gay if it's TSA
I used bit warden to randomize and keep my passwords, have 2f auth, and use a bio sensor to unlock it on my phone. I imported hundreds of accounts from last pass. I only used it on my phone and used the bio sensor to unlock it. I forgot the master password after 3 months and had to create a new account with the old import. Only lost 3 months of updates, but still. Learned my lesson.
You're not wrong, "Being reasonable" can be saying "you are wrong! And here's why..." and as you said, that doesn't work. And kindness doesn't work either. I suggest we be less confrontational when trying to help them understand other views. It's hard and nuisanced. It's like saying "I'm not against you, but you're choices and support are not working the way you think they are", but in a clever way that isn't so obvious.
Yeah, fuck these guys that are trampling over human right... but like, I also would like change to happen. Being reasonable and kind isn't working. Neither is aggression.
That's how I'm reading it 💪. Although, I would let the eagle win🫡 🇺🇸
Unethical, but insightful. The bot took on fake identities and made up lies that strike at people's emotions to change their views. Unethical because it can manipulate real people (or other bot accounts) using made up facts or scenarios. Insightful because other bots are already doing this; they're just not disclosing it. There are more ethical ways to run this study. This was just the cheap and easy way.
Edit: spelling :p
I think more people need to approach it like this. Human's minds are designed to think with their group and resistant to change. If you actually want to change minds, insults and accusations will immediately put them into fight mode and they will defend their ideology. But if you don't attack their ideals and approach in a friendly kind of way, it will lead them to questioning their leader's choices. It's hard, I know. Their leader has made some shoot-themselves-in-the-foot choices and makes their conviction an easy target to attack. Insults and attacks may even be a way of letting off steam, but if you actually want change, it has to be a smart and kinder approach. It won't be an immediate change, but it will be gradual and large over time.
*Plants Redwood in enemy's yard*
AI trains using AI generated articles on repeat. Have you seen what happens to a YouTube video when you download and reupload a video over and over again?