ssfckdt

I'm really torn on that. Because I want media to be unbiased, but I also want media to tell the truth.

Most media will simply report the truth of what other people say is the truth.

I suppose I'd opt for unbias over bias if those were the two options.

We need the actual "it was actually done" versus "the circumstances were created such that it could have been done"

Oh, the doctors would immediately prescribe themselves vicodin.

I would ask her to correlate them with existence of violent movements alongside.

The MLK-Malcolm X dichotomy

In short, the presence of a militant option alongside your nonviolent option is quite useful in compelling the opposition to your side because the other option is the militant one.

Meanwhile you can still get away with most of what you learned in Java 1.4.

I think you'd get better traction out of this if it said quantum mechanics

That's a very good move! To counter, you should follow these three principles:

• Prepare a response move that will prevent a future good move.

• Defend your own pieces and try to attack theirs.

• Don't be too eager to sacrifice pieces in order to make short term gains.

• Be prepared to sacrifice an unimportant piece to make a good gain.

If you want to make a good move, try Rook H8 -> G7.

Dark Crystal vibes

You mean blaming leftists?

Is that your general experience with people doing dumb things? That they only do it once?

I think the best outcome would be that it might uncover deliberate malfeasance that might prompt some folks in congress to do what is needed. I wouldn't be optimistic though.

Slightly more likely is that such discovery would drive the public towards a congressional swing away from his enablers at the next congressional election next year, assuming we have it. I'm moderately more optimistic on that, apparently such a swing is already forming, but to what extent isn't clear.

We can't undo the election results, the congressional count done on jan 6 is definitive.

Nearly every respectable major news outlet that has commentary tries to invite commentary from multiple sides. They also probably didn't know what he would become or his ulterior motives.