sureshot

joined 3 days ago
[–] sureshot@discuss.online 5 points 4 hours ago

That's not really true, we're at the point where oligarchs basically have the unlimited money glitch, they don't give a fuck about what the consumers ask for and just demand that we want things that help them screw us over. That's why every job and every application process demands that prospective employees have their own car and their own smartphone.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 6 points 4 hours ago

this forced birthing thing sort of reminds me of one child policy in a way... ironically no one is thinking about how this will impact men long term. women are just supposed to fulfill this need for companionship and reproduction without any reciprocation, even though everything on this planet, even breathing, is transactional. when we inhale we get oxygen and when we exhale we give CO2. it is physically impossible to get something for nothing in this world. if you want a woman to have your kids, you've got to pay her in some way. if you don't provide for her, and she can't provide for herself, it is physically impossible for her to have enough calories to produce a child and physically impossible for her to have enough money to raise it. that's just life. and if you try to arm twist women (or anyone or anything else) into doing the impossible, they're just going to totally disengage.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 1 points 5 hours ago

I can't believe this scene could be real. I thought it was supposed to be a hallucination and the dog actually attacked the man because he has brain damage. But, he's actually supposed to have shot the man by accident? So weird to blame a dog for that.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 2 points 5 hours ago

This was a scene in Plague Dogs that I thought was super unrealistic, a dog steps on a gun, which discharges into a man, and people blame the dog as if he shot the man on purpose. I thought it couldn't happen in real life.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 3 points 5 hours ago

Blaming the dog????

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

The AI nuance makes this make more sense… the law has yet to catch up.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I deleted my comment before you could reply because I knew you were going to give me a long windbag answer that I would absolutely not fucking read, and I was right. You are responding to a deleted post. That means I don’t care anymore and you win. Please leave me alone.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Holy shit, that was me? I alone can decide the president? And I decided Trump? Holy fuck.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

It's so messed up that the father disavowed her in the article. He failed her too. Maybe he should have been the one responsible for this beat down, that's how it would have gone when I was in elementary. This generation is fucked.

[–] sureshot@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, when I was a kid if a girl sent a naked photo to a boy and he distributed it, they could both get busted for CP, usually the boy would face a harsher punishment for distribution and the girl could negotiate something else. This image was created totally without the girl's consent or knowledge, so the boy is the only one at fault

view more: next ›