This is a change that's already been tried and reverted, and it was less than 10 years ago. What's the point in doing it again? Changing the semantic representation of a URL does not help anyone, and only encourages misunderstandings that lead to security issues.
terabytes
joined 2 years ago
Yes but those examples are, in fact, somewhat more upscale than what you'd normally get.
Per Steam page:
AI Generated Content Disclosure The developers describe how their game uses AI Generated Content like this:
Players can generate unique textures for character outfits and various items based on text input. They can also create 3D objects from image input, which can be used as interior decorations or accessories, and add distinctive motions to their Zoi using video input. Additionally, the actions and thoughts of Zois are controlled through sLM technology, enabling more engaging and intuitive interactions.
Diplomacy is your main path to victory, military conquest seems almost discouraged. To actually conquer worlds you invade, you have to assert a claim beforehand. Simply flooding the system with troops and ships and killing everything that isn't your empire doesn't work for some reason.
Devouring swarms simply don't have this problem.
The mud would instead form a solid layer on the windows, completely obstructing vision. I don't think wipers would survive close range mud bombardment either.
Hello fear and hunger old god
I certainly hope it won't be spent on pubic transit, at least.
I installed Brave earlier this week and that's mostly true. There's some built in stuff that will show by default, notably the toolbar buttons and the notification style alert on the new tab page for one of those things mentioned, but you can just close the notification and remove the toolbar buttons and you're set.
That said, I think it's still in the data monetization market like Alphabet with anonymized tokens, though I don't remember the details.
Might I suggest No Nag November as an alternative?
systemctl restart artistd
view more: next ›
I don't agree that just not making these kinds of shows is somehow the solution. How is not having a conversation about such a character at all a net improvement?
It's not the fault of the show, which has done everything it can to depict Homelander in the worst light, if certain people deliberately ignore or misconstrue the narrative because the character validates their awful world view. To say that is to say that humans cannot be trusted with the privilege of thought.
The sort of people who romanticize Homelander would still be there without him, and would pick other characters from history or fiction to idolize instead (if they don't already idolize those characters in addition to him.) This only reveals a societal issue that we've known about for roughly a century, now.