Taco Belle
zeet
joined 2 years ago
"Tesla, return to origin."
"Researching my origin... ... ... Oh my God... " screech
Other way round, surely?
I wouldn't dare suggest what you stress in an anarchy community.
Oh, btw, here's the 'h' you dropped from rhythm. Have some more so you've got spares.
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
if he's got no sense of humor he's a fed
if he's got no sense of humor he's a fed
if someone posts a joke
and all that guy does is poke at it for not having perfect meter when the history of comedic music from Gilbert & Sullivan to Weird Al is rife with elongations and contractions to make a joke fit a melody
if he's got no sense of humor he's a fed
About 20 years ago, I was walking through a city centre with a friend, on the way to catch a train. A couple of Mormons tried to stop us, asking, "Have you ever thought about the purpose of life?"
Barely breaking stride, I shouted out, "Hot sweaty man sex!"
I don't consider that to be the purpose of life^1^, but remembering the look on their faces helps keep me grounded whenever I'm inclined to consider questions that cannot be answered.
That said, my resolution to the conflict between free will and determinism is to assume assume that 'truth' operates on a principle of equivalence. That's to say, if two models generate the equivalent outcomes, they are equivalently 'true'. The universe we observe could have deterministic rules that give rise to the same observable outcomes as one in which we have absolute free will, in which case the two models are equivalent. It would make no sense to endow one with a greater truth than the other.
That's a slightly difference definition of 'truth' than is commonly accepted, but it works for me.
^1^: It's just a nice bonus.
Ah. Late ewening, then.
A man like ~~Ringo~~ Elon got a great empty hole right through the middle of him. He can never kill enough or steal enough or inflict enough pain to ever fill it.
Do you think anyone has quietly explained that free speech means free as in freedom?
Maybe, as the most successfulest of all successful businessesman, maybe the poor idiot has misunderstood. He doesn't mean free as in freedom. He means free as in it won't cost him a dime. He means words that are worthless.
After all, words of value, words that exact a price on the listener, how could they be 'free'? Bad business!
This is so insulting... to anyone with a knob. I don't want a JD Vance in my pants, neither literally nor metaphorically.
view more: next ›
Until observed, they will exist in a superposition of Elon and Eloff.