this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
199 points (97.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CNN analysts immediately after the debate are saying the dems are pannicing.

lol, lmao, who could’ve seen this coming

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 91 points 1 year ago (4 children)

me putting on the conspiracy theory hat and wildly gesturing like a crank

What if the DNC purposely never wanted Biden but waited until after it was too late for primaries so they can handpick the actual candidate they want at the DNC convention and purposely pushed him to have a debate with Trump knowing that Biden would eat shit?

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus fucking christ I've never seen a picture of the man before. He looks like Satan would look in a hollywood drama.

He looks oddly like Geert Wilders

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the Dems had fucked themselves by backing genocide Joe but newsome is the one Democratic politician that could actually win. Does it change anything for me. Not really. I'm just here for the show

[–] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not the only one, Whitmer would walk the dog with Trump.

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whitmer is also good but newsome appeals more to men since America is so patriarchal I'd think he'd have a better chance

I could see that, but I'm not convinced it would make or break things.

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

His recent meeting with Xi makes me think he might not be as hostile towards China as the other two have been but that’s more likely wishful thinking

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Looking forward to half of Hexbear arguing we should vote for Gavin in order to do "Harm Reduction" just like they did last election for Joe.

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Please no. I hope we're past that. Please. Please can we just PPB folks like that and ban them and move on.

[–] Greenleaf@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Respectfully, comrade, nowhere near half of hexbear was advocating for Biden as the harm reduction candidate. There were some posters here and there who might have said that but the overwhelming majority of the site, like 97%, was saying “fuck these guys I’m not voting for either”.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

It felt like much more than 3% of the site arguing for Biden after he got the nom

The lanyard nerds would absolutely prefer this outcome (particularly if they're mad at Biden screeching YOU WERENT ELECTED at them when they bring up reality) far more than the possibility of a real primary and having to pull another hoodwink on bernie's old ass a third time

[–] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is how Bernie can still win. His good friend Biden will hand pick him as his successor

spoilerbut then he'll lose becsuse none of us will vote for him after he hitched himself to Genocide Joe

[–] jack@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I have been saying it