PSL are not trots. PSL supports Cuba, Vietnam, China and the historical USSR.
PSL did branch from a trot organization, which might be why you think this. This is because most surviving leftist organizations in America post WW2 redscare were trot organizations.

Links to some random PSL publication articles to prove my point. https://www.liberationschool.org/category/china-2/

https://www.liberationnews.org/tag/cuba/

https://www.liberationnews.org/how-vietnam-defeated-u-s-imperialism/

https://www.liberationschool.org/theory-and-revolution-addressing-the-break-of-ideological-continuity/

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah thanks for that. I knew they descended from a trot org and a member I know had a pretty disgusting pro-NATO stance on something so I just assumed.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If a member of PSL was pro-NATO they are contradicting a fundamental, non-negotiable part of the party line and should be spoken to by local leadership

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago

ah now I remember! they were both-sidesing balkanization, placing an emphasis on the bosnian genocide

[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

PSL are Marcyites, who are Trots that accidentally stumbled into being MLs.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago

That's historically accurate but doesn't in any way describe the politics or operation of the party today. We are straight up MLs who have very intentionally shed that trot shit a long time ago.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

PSL published a book last year about why China is good and sent a delegation to meet with Diaz-Canal in Cuba last month