this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
83 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

9691 readers
650 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In recent years, Canadians have increasingly seen financial firms — such as private equity firms and real estate investment trusts (REITs) — buying up apartment buildings. The largest 25 financial landlords in Canada hold nearly 20 per cent of the country’s private, purpose-built rental stock.

At the same time, Canada’s housing affordability crisis has exploded. A 2022 report found that in 93 per cent of Canadian neighbourhoods, a full-time minimum wage worker cannot afford a one-bedroom apartment.

Many observers have connected this financialization of housing to rising unaffordability. But until recently, a lack of data has made it challenging to prove it.

Our recent study, based on building-level rent and ownership data in the Greater Toronto Area, is the first to decisively show that financial firms charge higher rents and raise them more quickly than other landlords. We also found that financial firms raise rents most aggressively in lower-income areas with more racialized residents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No. But the added pressure means there's more demand for housing. Meaning landlords can jack up prices further.

BTW, not saying the immigrants themselves are the problem. Rather the high immigration levels set the by the federal government. Immigrants are victims in all of this.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is nothing wrong with "demand". It is essential to economic growth. Market forces, and governments are the ones failing here.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm sorry. But we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I mean, you're not wrong. But I also believe that what I'm saying is true.

I mean the federal government's ministry of immigration and citizenship has admitted that it is a factor.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Immigration is a factor. Governments (note the S) lack of planning and strategy around it, leaving it to the invisible hand of "market forces" hasn't worked. Even without immigration social trends alone would have dictated higher housing demand as more people are staying single or getting divorced and living on their own. This era of artificially low interest rates and being awash in excessive liquidity for prolonged periods due to various "financial" crises is a much bigger factor in this by creating this prolonged housing bubble. Housing shortages aren't just local. It's global. The world's population has always been growing. There's always been immigration. The reason we have governments is properly manage and plan for these things. It's been a failure at every single level - local, municipal, provincial, and federal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)