this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
73 points (92.9% liked)

World News

47985 readers
3085 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A hospital in the Israeli town of Beersheba has been hit as Iran fired a barrage of missiles, with the conflict between the two countries continuing into a seventh day.

Iran said the strike had targeted a military site close to the hospital, not the facility itself. Dozens of people were reported injured in several locations across Israel, including near Tel Aviv.

After visiting the Soroka Medical Centre on Thursday, Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader "can no longer be allowed to exist".

Meanwhile, Israel's military said it had targeted Iran's nuclear sites including the "inactive" Arak heavy water reactor and Natanz facility.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now that they are fighting people who can actually retaliate, maybe more people will realize they don't want to die for something that means nothing to them. The brainwashing is bad, though, so probably not for a while, if ever.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is my hope.

Vietnam taught the US that war actually means something when your country's actions force you to become involved when you didn't want to be.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think we learned anything from Vietnam. Though I do hope this will make Israelies realize they aren't gaining anything for the common person, just more hate, loss, and economic struggle eventually.

Lessons we were supposed to learn from Vietnam.

  • The government will lie to its citizens and use propoganda to push an agenda to help their careers over valuing our populous' lives, money, or feelings.

  • The media will allow misinformation to flow so long as they can make personal/company prosperity off of it

  • Support systems are lacking for the troops as well as benefits.

In the last week we have seen calls to cut aid to troops, citizens, and the media overflow with misinformation to push forward agendas that are not in the best interest of the common citizen.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Some of that's true, yes.

But you're missing the bigger point here: the antiwar movement in the US flourished because people who didn't want to fight were forced to fight, and the American government saw that the military draft was self-defeating and, while it still exists statutorily, it is effectively nonexistent because they don't want another anti-war movement interrupting the gravy train.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The number of active duty troops needed by the U.S. to enter battle gas fallen drastically. We aren't actually trying to occupy anything. For instance we sent 130,000 into Iraq in 2003, and the needed numbers have fallen more since as warfare advances. The U.S. has over 2,000,000 troops and 700,000 reserves. The draft was retired because we don't need it. We just view it as the draft being gone because that's what the government wanted us to see/believe. Yet every male in the U.S. is required by law to sign up. Propoganda works wonders on us all. Will we see a ban occur, someday I'm sure, but it won't be before we know volunteers far outweigh what's needed for the greed of the rich.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you for your commentary.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, sitting in meeting bored. Didn't know what to do with the time

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No worries. :)