Fuck AI

3561 readers

194 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

themaninblack@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

ogmios@sh.itjust.works

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

vibe physics (www.youtube.com)

submitted 3 days ago by CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Angela Collier (the same woman who posted an almost 1 hour video about how Target failed to understand their customers when they stood down their DEI programs) posted this video that summarizes the problem with AI.

Very worth the watch (or listen)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had to fight my urge to explain how dumb this quote is. Everybody see how undeniably dumb it is right? Right?

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

You mean in the sense of you saw it gave you garbage, and corrected what you knew to be wrong; what you did not know to be wrong you took as truth as it was new to you and you could not critique it properly? I guess there must be a bias-concept which this behaviour is included in.