this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
327 points (88.1% liked)

Science

13166 readers
1 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lankybiker@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (6 children)

It's an article about environmental impact

"The impacts of vegans were a quarter of those of high meat eaters for greenhouse gas emissions, and land use, just 27% of the impacts for water pollution, 46% for water use and 34% for biodiversity. "

But let's be honest, you probably dont care, no one seems to care. People who do care are unusual and caring and taking action is unusual and might even earn you derision.

Personally I'm still trying to figure out whether there's any point in trying to change anyone's mind. I have a feeling it's a hopeless waste of energy, which is terrible. If the people do do care lose all will to try to encourage others to see what seems obvious then nothing will get better, it will probably get worse.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't think convincing average people to go 100% full vegan is a good strategy. What I would focus on is convincing people to eat less meat, eggs, dairy, etc. It can be a gradual process to even further reduction, or even just a permanent flat reduction is still an improvement.

Convincing two people to reduce their animal consumption by 50% is as good as convincing one person to go full vegan.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

i think ed winters has changed his focus from moralizing and guilt-tripping and is now actively trying to make vegan foods more available/accessible. so i don't even think you need to talk about meat at all: just offer people food that happens to be vegan. and i don't mean trick them into eating a soyburger: just make food that is naturally vegan and tastey and then that's the meal someone has eaten instead of a meaty one.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To add to this, a good dish that's inherently vegan is always going to be better than a meat-based dish with the meat replaced.

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

Amen to that - plants are delicious on their own, no need to try (and fail) to make fake meet with them. Just like I don't want/need my pork chops to taste kinda-sorta but not quite like tofu or beans, I don't want/need my tofu or beans to taste kinda-sorta but not quite like pork chops...

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Moralizing and guilt-tripping is never going to work. People will dig their heels in harder or completely cut out your message as toxic and abusive (and let's be honest, guilt-tripping is toxic and abusive shit and people who engage in it should be cut out of your life anyway).

Making items more accessible, available, and affordable is going to do more for your cause than turning a bunch of people away from you ever could.

[–] darq@kbin.social 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a solution is going to be less about changing minds, and more about changing incentives.

Meat-free food should be cheaper and easier. Walking into a supermarket or convenience store, one should be greeted with affordable, tasty, plant-based meals. The more affordable and accessible we make plant-based meals, the more people are going to eat them. And showing people that they can taste just as good as meat-based meals, will mean people won't immediately steer clear of them.

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’d also be great if they were nutritionally equivalent.

Plant based meats aren’t equivalent to animal meat on that front.

[–] darq@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Plant-based diets are usually superior, health-wise, to meat-based diets.

There are a couple of nutrients that vegan diets at one point may have fell short in, like B12 and D being common examples, but at this point those are present in fortified vegan milks or breads.

The only other ones I can think of off the top of my head are a fatty acid present in fish, that is easily supplemented. Or less essential nutrients like taurine, which are also easily supplemented if one finds that they really need higher levels.

[–] max@feddit.nl 9 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Most livestock gets supplemented B12 anyway, since the ground/soil is too clean for it to occur naturally like in the past. Might as well cut out the middle~~man~~cow.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It can be difficult to get enough protein with vegan options for people who aren't knowledgeable about the options.

[–] darq@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not really. Protein is not something particularly difficult in a reasonably balanced vegan diet, for most people. There are plenty of dietary sources of protein in vegan cooking.

Anybody requiring particularly high levels of protein is probably already supplementing it. Usually with vegan sources anyway.

Of all the possible deficiencies in a vegan diet, protein is by far the least of people's, already small, worries.

[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

It does get harder when you have to cut out an entire food group because of food allergies though.

[–] mildbeard@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There have been multiple scientific studies asking whether vegans get enough protein. The conclusion is always that they do. Here is one of them.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6893534/

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't say they don't, I said it's difficult for people who don't know how. You have to spend time on education when you go vegan.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Of course this is just one anecdote, but I stopped eating meat for the climate, because of the numbers. People posting papers, making informative comments (like your first half) changed my mind.

[–] FreeLunch@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

Same, it’s one of the good things that I got from being on Reddit/Feddit.

[–] lankybiker@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

That's encouraging

[–] czech@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't think you can change many minds. It would be more effective to make factory farming illegal so that meat prices increase dramatically. People will eat less meat when they can't afford not to.

[–] lankybiker@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Again, factory farming seems so, totally, horrific it's obvious that it should be consigned to history.

But feeling that way is something that only a tiny minority of people seem to share. Most people just don't care.

People love meat and are willing to totally ignore the suffering behind it. Never mind environmental impacts. .

[–] Gawanoh@feddit.de 6 points 2 years ago

Animal products were and should be again luxury products.

[–] lexaflexa@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That would be nice, but in a democracy, no one is going to vote to inconvenience to themselves. We have to find motivation by other means than being forced, or we will create a society where nothing good happens without being forced to.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

in a democracy, no one is going to vote to inconvenience to themselves.

Some people will, because they recognize that something is more important than their own convenience. But there are, regrettably, a lot who won't.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Look at the election in the Netherlands, the government had declared plans to reduce the nitrogen poisoning by the animal industry, the animalfarmers made a campaign and the people voted for a conservative right "farmers party"

We need to show support or those who are against change will win.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

But let's be honest, you probably dont care, no one seems to care. People who do care are unusual and caring and taking action is unusual and might even earn you derision.

That’s not really true is it? There have never been more, better and more popular vegan food options. And while the number of actual vegans is (still?) low, the “less meat” contingent is growing every second.

We have definitely rounded a corner here.

And I haven’t seen any outright derision of vegetarians of vegans since I left college. And that was a long time ago.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you think I'm going without the odd sausage roll, pizza, spagbol or chippy tea when we've got near-billionaire cunts like Sunak whizzing about the place in private jets, allowing companies to extract more gas from the North Sea, and going on mad rants about anti-car policies, you can think again.

The world is miserable enough without having to eat vegan food.

[–] lankybiker@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah I totally get your point. And if everyone thinks like you we're all definitely fucked

[–] boredazfcuk@mastodon.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@lankybiker @Blackmist well clearly not everyone thinks like him, coz what, 4% of the population are vegan? I’m Team Vegan. I’m really rooting for those guys. I hope they can pull us right out of this mess. I wish them the best of luck.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If you think veganism will save the world, you should probably look at a graph of greenhouse gas sources.

I don't drive. I've already done more than vegans ever will. Got an electric car? Good for you, but in the US that will still be powered by 60-70% coal and gas.

The only thing vegans have is the moral superiority on animal cruelty.

The only thing that will save the world is to stop burning fossil fuels. The only people that can force that change are governments. Once again those in charge have turned the people on each other. "Look at him, he's eating meat! Doesn't he know he's killing the planet?", while they're authorising another gas powerplant being built, or pushing back the banning of petrol cars by five years.

[–] boredazfcuk@mastodon.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Blackmist no, I don’t think veganism will save the world on its own. No single solution will… but veganism will be part of the solution. Animal farming contributes about 10% of the green house gasses, so it’s not an insignificant amount.

The world could ban office work in favour of remote work tomorrow. Eliminating the daily commute for a large portion of people would be a huge win fighting gas emissions. They can then repurpose those empty skyscrapers as lab grown meat factories.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago

Even there, the 10% (and I've seen figures between 8% and 15%) is mostly going to be from the extra fossil fuels used in the production of it, growing the corn, etc, that feeds them, transporting the feed, transporting all the livestock and meat around, refrigeration... Aside from the livestock breathing and farting, it's nearly all power.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba7357

Mind you, this is from 2 years ago: If we stopped all fossil fuels at that time, our diet would alone increase the temperature by 2°C

It is vastly proven by studies that vegans not only act different in regards of their diet but also in every other aspect, so you are not special. Vegans don't need more cars than any other group.

Even if we could afford to kill billions each year for taste, you yourself stated that it is morally preferable not to. So what is your excuse?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -1 points 2 years ago

So what is your excuse?

I like meat and dairy and I don't care about the moral part of it at all.

If it's available for me to buy, I will continue to eat it.

It really is as simple as that.

[–] mackwinston@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'm not vegan or even vegetarian, but vegan food is for the most part absolutely awesome and not "miserable" in the slightest. I've had to seriously cut back on meat for health reasons, and I've discovered...I just don't miss meat. Vegan/vegetarian food is often just better.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -2 points 2 years ago

You do you. But it's mostly for your health, rather than the environment.

Personally I don't even eat a lot of meat. I just don't enjoy vegetables, and I'm certainly not giving up cheese. That shit is awesome.