this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
99 points (99.0% liked)
Space
1829 readers
40 users here now
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instanceβs local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
Related Communities
π Science
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
π Engineering
π Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Define slop
Don't act obtuse, please.
My dude, I gave you the justification for the double entendre right there. Itβs exactly how I would have interpreted it. Your low energy replies did not warrant more than a low energy retort.
No, you copied and pasted slop from a slop machine. Talk about "low energy." Stop pretending like everyone else's time is worth less than yours.
Ooh your one sentence retorts are so edgy. Whoβs pretending to whom here?
Maybe people would have more meaningful conversation with you if you actually put in some effort.
You're the only one who seems to be struggling with it.
Keep your low effort replies to yourself, please.
Please remind me who's pasting slop.
For someone who thinks their time is valuable, youβre sure giving me lots of it.
Don't worry, it takes very little effort to respond to your slop.
I bet it does.
Talk about low-energy.
.
OK, that was legitimately hilarious.
My dude, I gave you the justification for the double entendre right there. Itβs exactly how I would have interpreted it. Your low energy replies did not warrant more than a low energy retort.