this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4105 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/32623894

On vaporware as an ideological product.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I don't understand the "waffles" comment though, even after reading the context.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think it's a riff on an old meme I don't quite remember. But the idea is like,

  • people are doing an innocuous thing
  • something declares that they thus must hate dubiously related thing

Like, someone playing checkers. Someone says "oh you're playing checkers because you hate chess!?". You can kind of see how they made that leap through several errors (view chess and checkers as mutually exclusive opposites)

So the person in the quote thinks banning whoever is a non sequitur, I guess.

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

I can see the original quote being either about a logical fallacy as you're explaining or about entering spaces to confront people about unrelated things. That doesn't bring me any closer to understanding the "checkers" / "waffles" reply though. Is she saying "stay on the topic"? I really don't know.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago

Non sequiturs is how humans operate.
No technology will fix that.
Jay is the CEO of BlueSky.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

maybe it's like a kind of tone policing, like "hey we were joking about pancakes and waffles, and now you're raising a serious topic" but in a jokey kind of way

but yeah, it doesn't make sense to me, that's just my imagination stretching to interpret it