this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
1369 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

9437 readers
2088 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 195 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Problem is that when they see "love they neighbor" they look around and only see straight white folks, so they assume everyone else is excluded for some reason

[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When I was in Sunday School, we were given a strict (Catholic Catechism) definition: Your neighbor is anyone you meet. It doesn't even specify any "human." My mom always brought home that point whenever animal cruelty was discussed.

Of course, my parents who taught me that lesson are still Catholic and yet super proud of my identity. Very chill with my trans spouse. Even marched with me at a local pride event.

Maybe they're the exception but "love thy neighbor" does still have tangible meaning to some folks.

[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago

I’m glad to hear that they are so supportive, that’s awesome! I hope my Catholic parents are as accepting when I come out to them as trans

[–] saimen@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah might be a translation issue. In the german version it's not "neighbour" but rather "the one next to you".

[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

In French too. "Aime ton prochain".

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

It's the same in finnish as well; the word used is "lähimmäinen", which translates as "the one that is closest to you". Basically implying everyone you meet

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Me too. Very much.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Race science was created specifically so that they could see non-white people as non-people. This was done so that Christians could (just barely) hold onto their belief system while committing all of the atrocities of the colonial era.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

I actually just happened to be reading a relevant part of Lies My Teacher Told Me that quotes Montesquieu (French philosopher who influenced the US founding fathers):

It is impossible for us to suppose these creatures to be men, because, allowing them to be men, a suspicion would follow that we ourselves are not Christian.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do they see "love thy neighbor?" I think many ignore that part entirely

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I promise you they hate straight white guys too, if you even express a hint of kindness.

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It was a racial clause from the beginning. -The word wasn't needed otherwise. -Same as the sexual clause 'neighbour's wife' instead of 'spouse'.

And context supports that:

'Think not that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets', 'Do not go among the Gentiles', 'I have come only for the lost sheep of Israel', 'it is not meet to take the children's bread and cast it to the dogs'.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean the Bible is pretty clear on this. In response to the question, "who is my neighbour," Jesus answered with the parable of the Good Samaritan. In Christianity, everyone is your neighbour.

In Judaism there was a lot of debate about it historically and I don't know where things stand now.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In Judaism there was a lot of debate about it historically and I don’t know where things stand now.

Jews are cool with their neighbors. Zios are genocidal. It's not that complicated.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Given that the phrase "love your neighbour" comes from the Torah, it is at least 2500 years old, predating what you mean by Zionism by millenia.

This was a poor excuse to shoehorn irrelevant modern-day issues where it doesn't belong.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Strange, because Leviticus says

You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt:

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sojourn: "short stay, temporary residence". -That's if they aren't subject to the OTs calls for genocide: Deuteronomy 20:16-17, Joshua 6:21, 1 Samuel 15:3, Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 2:34, 1 Samuel 15:18, Judges 21:10, 2 Kings 10:7. or appointed to slavery: Leviticus 25: 44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Jesus didn't give a shit about the old testament. Neither should anybody else. It's like the whole point of the gospels...

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

'Think not that I have come to destroy the law or the prophets' -His sole existence is based on the OT and is referenced in the first chapter of John. You might be thinking Saul of Tarsus.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Are you saying that the term neighbour was chosen here so that there's a way exclude certain people?

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's not like they weren't instructed to kill and enslave elsewhere in the Bible.

Genocide:

Deuteronomy 20:16-17, Joshua 6:21, 1 Samuel 15:3, Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 2:34, 1 Samuel 15:18, Judges 21:10, 2 Kings 10:7.

Slavery:

Leviticus 25: 44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No need for irrelevant ancient texts.

The obvious interpretation is that Jesus actually meant what he said. There are no tales of Jesus enslaving people or promoting genocide.

You're just a gross fash troll.

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"think not that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets"

Typical defender can't quote.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You are totally misrepresenting the last verse.

He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”

“Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.

Jesus is being called out by the Cannanite woman and is in the wrong here.

“Do not go out among the Gentiles” is in the context of his specific instructions to the apostles at one point in time. The commission is expanded later.

You can’t pick and choose isolated verses - you’re acting like a Christian.

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, you're acting Saulinian. -The guy that never walked with Jewsus, lost the lottery to Matthias, destroys the law, lies, and flip flops.

If you want to play context, don't ignore that Jewsus is the same OT god that subjected women to sex slavery, certain people to brutal racial slavery, and some to genocide. -And don't ignore all the sexist clauses in their laws and teachings.

Even dogs, beasts of the field (synonym for Gentile in Bible) are rewarded. It doesn't mean they're eligible for 'salvation'.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Paul doesn’t count

But also

every verse about the Amaleks does

You pick and choose like a good little Christian. The anti semitism is always lovely touch too.

I’d love for you to give me an example of a non sexist Bronze Age society.

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You defend like a dick skinning death cultist.

Imagine a society not ruled by your sexist/ racist death cult... maybe a non-sexist one! -Suprise suprise!

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I love the black and white thinking. Obviously, I must be a Christian because I don’t think the Bible is nothing but “kill all unbelievers” scrawled repeatedly in blood.

C’mon Mister Logical - can you tell me what a false dichotomy is?

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They’re called to “love thy enemy as themselves” as well. So it’s not just their neighbors, but also the people they hold hatred for that they are called to love.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

They just see the kids in their church.