this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
308 points (94.0% liked)

Privacy

4131 readers
32 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
308
California passes law requiring age verification checks for all operating systems | Governor Newsom signs bills to further strengthen California’s leadership in protecting children online (www.gov.ca.gov)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
163 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

AB-1043 "Age verification signals: software applications and online services."

Text https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

Other info https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

California AB 1043 signed. Mandatory os-level, device-level, app store, and even developer-required age verification for all computing devices.

Edit: altered title from "ID check" to "Age Verification check"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 154 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Good luck enforcing that on Linux.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 116 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's probably the point.

I wouldn't be surprised if Microsoft and Google lobbied for this to prevent open source from encroaching on their terf

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Likely yes, though it won't matter to me. I'll recompile from suitably modified source code if it comes to that.

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They might try to stop Linux from booting at all with locked bootloaders.

[–] Zeon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Libreboot.org

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

that would basically destroy the internet considering how many servers - including microsofts own sites - run on linux

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That would be the point at which things - expensive, crucial things - would start catching on fire for reasons that has nothing to do with anything I might be doing.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Like what? I believe you but I'm interested in the implications of this bill

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's precedent that source code is protected speech, so maybe Gentoo is about to become a lot more popular.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And who doesn't enjoy using 90% of their system resources to compile the 10% remainder all the time?

[–] msage@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

You can compile while doing other things.

Any recent (AMD) cpu will handle it just fine.

Even most games struggle to utilize many threads.

Gentoo is also amazingly easy to use.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

You can use binary versions if you want.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

reinstalling OS is fairly easy. I expect utlities to "correct age error".

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The bigger distros will probably do it, especially any that have an organization to fund their development.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That have funding from American organizations, or are an American organization themselves. Possibly even Californian only.