this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
657 points (98.5% liked)

News

36744 readers
3083 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Un-redacted text from released documents began circulating on social media on Monday evening

People examining documents released by the Department of Justice in the Jeffrey Epstein case discovered that some of the file redaction can be undone with Photoshop techniques, or by simply highlighting text to paste into a word processing file.

Un-redacted text from these documents began circulating through social media on Monday evening. An exhibit in a civil case in the Virgin Islands against Darren K Indyke and Richard D Kahn, two executors of Epstein’s estate, contains redacted allegations explaining how Epstein and his associates had facilitated the sexual abuse of children. The exhibit was part of the second amended complaint in the state case against Indyke and Kahn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 111 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This is what happens when you pull in people that don’t normally do records management. They redact using black highlighter instead of the redaction tool.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 98 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Or, this is what happens when people who work for the government really hate Donald Trump.

Malicious compliance

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You have to be more careful than many people expect think with the redaction tool. Sometimes it's text being redacted. Sometimes it's a graphic. Sometimes it's both on top of each other.

That's why my final step in redacting documents for Open Records (I do a LOT of it) is to flatten the PDF.

But the real bitch is protected docs. Some docs keep the redaction tool from working (e.g. docs with digital signatures). Sometimes I actually have to print a doc out and re-scan it to get the redactions to stick.

[–] NickeeCoco@piefed.social 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

why are there so many people in this thread that redact things often enough to have favorite workflows?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I work in government and Open Records requests are regular things, and I have to redact a bunch of stuff to protect people's privacy.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 12 points 3 months ago

Thank you for your service

Hang in there

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I redact, print, and then scan. Its the only way to be sure.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Export to PNG -> redact PNG.

Ain't nothing hiding behind those (0,0,0) pixels.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

I do all my markup, attempt to flatten, then print the result to PDF, then open the result and export the text to validate.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

they are all incompetent, i call it bottom of the barrel, no one complement wants to work there.

the technical term is Kakistocracy.