this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
932 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

21060 readers
2121 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I didn't really interpret it that way. I took it as "look how annoying people who complain about social justice are".

I don't think she literally supports slavery but it was clearly an allegory for what she views as annoying activist types.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rowling said on multiple occasions that Hermione is her "idealized self-insert".

So I don't think she'd use her own self-insert to say "Look how stupid people like me are". Doesn't really make sense.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

She also said that she was Black, so I’m not sure how trustworthy she is on the subject

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IIRC she said she never specified Hermione's race, which is technically true. But at one point she did physically describe her to be fair skinned.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And as having pink cheeks

[–] bbboi@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hermione isn't a real person. An author can make their characters whatever they want at any time for any reason with no regard for established cannon. Writers do it all the time. They may be terrible writers, or even terrible people, but none the less they "own" the character.

Ditch the bitch and stop complaining about skin tone.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What an odd response

Does the fact that a character isn’t real mean that we can’t point out when an author contradicts themselves? Even if she claimed that the contradiction doesn’t exist?

Does referring to someone in a thread about that person mean that you’re a fan of them?

Does mentioning where someone has contradicted themselves mean that you’re complaining about the thing that they contradicted themselves over?

Did you put any thought whatsoever into your post or was it just a knee-jerk response?

[–] bbboi@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's just weird to fixate on skin tone. There's plenty to criticize JK about, but that ain't it.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I didn’t focus on skin tone. I referenced where a public statement about the character by Rowling contradicted what’s in the books.

[–] bbboi@feddit.uk 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

about skin tone as if it's weird that a character is played by somebody of the "wrong" race

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I don’t control what Rowling said or what she wrote in the books.

Okay, if you think it’s wrong for me to bring up this particular thing that Rowling said, tell me which other public statement that Rowling has made where she contradicts what the books say about Hermione should i have referenced instead?

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

It was prevailing thought at the time though too (~2000s), I remember my mates and I looking at activists with some measurable annoyance and disdain. I don't think her attitude was so far out of whack with the general vibe