Chicago Bears

2 readers

1 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@nfl.community

Luke Getsy the next Ken Dorsey? (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by Equivalent_Willow567@alien.top to c/bears@nfl.community

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So Ken Dorsey loses his job why can’t Luke Getsy? I think Flus needs to self scout Getsy’s scheme and see that it’s really not tailored to JF. I know it’s been said before but what will it take? Flus did pretty alright getting the defense ramped up and gelling. Why don’t reporters press Flus during media interviews about his OC and the schemes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CNashFF@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At this point, firing getsy would do more harm than good in evaluating fields. He’s not learning a new system and playbook in one week in between games, so any replacement OC is going to keep the same system in place. You’re just adding another variable into the equation of evaluating your QB.

After the season they can evaluate the job Getsy did and see what they want to do. At this point, you’ve got to ride with what you have because you can’t re-do an entire system in one week and expect it to run successfully.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Could you keep the playbook and change the playcaller?

[–] airJordan45@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s what the Bills are doing because they have Joe Brady as a QB coach that has previous experience as OC in the league. The Bears don’t really have anyone on the offensive side with any play calling experience at any level.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

There's always Justin.

[–] tree1234567@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

When an OC change happens. It’s just what’s dialed up, not a whole new system… there are designed runs that haven’t been called yet, haven’t seen any read option this year tbh.