whatlambda

joined 2 years ago
[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

That QB has done reasonably well with Minnesota until playing us though.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

In which case, Flus probably isn't going anywhere.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

who's been a bottom 5 passer since entering the league.

This is not a thing, at least not this year.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Which guy is worth taking though?

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

We won, but this is the most down I've been on Fields all year. It's complicated.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Roschon Johnson = RB1.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I feel like this is at the crux of the Fields vs. draft QB debate.

If you don't draft a QB at #1, you can take higher-probability successes (MHJ) or trade down into more picks, which increases the chances you get some viable starters and possibly even elite players.

If you do draft a QB, you're really hoping that guy works out. And by "works out" I mean is an elite contributor at the NFL level. He has to be, because you're trying to replace a fairly average NFL starter, so the marginal benefit is diminished if the guy you draft is just pretty good.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I'm not ignoring any of that. Furthermore, I do not think Fields' rush rate is sustainable.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So, speaking as someone who would prefer to keep Fields and take MHJ...

Caleb Williams is being very underrated at this point, and would look like Bagent with a cannon in our offense. I just worry that Chicago will destroy him.

I don't know what to do with that information other than post it here. Just a semi-random thought for the draft speculation thread of the day.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Our talent level is where it needs to be to compete most weeks against most teams, but it's not where it needs to be to be favored against decent teams quite yet.

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The case for keeping Eberflus, to the extent one exists, is in the improvement we see each week from the young guys. You can't separate growth in guys like Jones, Stevenson, Dexter, Gordon, Fields, etc. from the guy who keeps talking about the need to get the details right and focus on execution week after week. These things are related!

It's fair to ask if Eberflus is the coach to make this team a winner (maybe not), but it's also fair to ask if he is the best coach to build a winning roster (maybe).

[–] whatlambda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

This team, top to bottom, is really close to being able to compete week after week. Add a couple difference makers and we're a real competitor.

 

Say what you will about this team, the culture is definitely not a problem.

view more: next ›