this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
178 points (99.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 127 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Okay but it’s illegal for him to distribute counterfeit money knowingly isn’t it

[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, this guy is committing a serious federal offense and could very easily be put in prison if the authorities decided to prosecute him. Whether that would actually happen depends on how connected he is to powerful people, of course, but there is zero ambiguity about the legality here.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. It is really infuriating that that’s how it works. Makes me wish I had the free time and drive to become a vigilante.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's the thing, isn't it? If someone shot this dude it would just feed into his narrative even more and give people like him more power. Only way to actually make a difference is to get organized with enough people to carry out coherent actions (which would definitely be a lot less violent, at least initially, than shooting ghouls like this guy).

[–] Deadend@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Counter-point - more bullets for more people like him punished-bernie

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

inshallah-script

That's what you need organization for, so that when things get real (which is almost always provoked by the bourgeois side of things) you have more people ready to keep the thing going. Spontaneous and individualistic movements fade out just as easily as they come into existence.

[–] Hello_Kitty_enjoyer@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

you can do both

[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Vanguards of Liberation - Martyr John Brown Group

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

its not counterfeit its movie prop money, 20% larger or smaller than real money

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 65 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure this is still illegal, he's attempting to put the money into circulation by giving people the false impression that it is real legal tender.

Like hypothetically if you're so charismatic that you manage to convince a bank teller that a piece of printer paper you wrote "Gay Sex" on with a crayon is actual legal tender I still think that counts as counterfeiting, because you're still putting false currency into circulation.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago

Selling all my holdings in Iraqi dinars to reinvest in gay sex bux

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the problem is its a rich guy allegedly doing this to homeless people

The least likely to be treated fairly under the law of this country scenario I can think of other than if it was 1820 and he was doing this to actual slaves

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I doubt he'd ever see the inside of a jail cell over this.

However, if enough people reported him for this it maybe enough for the Dept. of the Treasury to send him a notice or something which would probably scare him into not doing it anymore.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the Dept. of the Treasury to send him a notice or something which would probably scare him into not doing it anymore.

What'll likely happen is that he'll claim he's being censored by the "woke homeless loving radical liberal leftists" or something

Yes he likely will but I think the Dept of the Treasury won't be swayed by that argument

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

It's a giant novelty check actually

Where am I supposed to redeem my gay sex coupons?!

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay. But surely if it’s illegal for you to attempt to use it as legal tender it must be illegal to give it to people under that pretence, no?

[–] D61@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I bet I bet I bet....

Because its just being given to another person but no given to a cashier to pay for something, its "not illegal"

The internet says... I'm wrong... hooray!

https://abovethelaw.com/2024/05/admit-counterfeit-bills-homeless/

But if we take him at his word, he is at the very least in breach of 18 U.S. Code § 472:

Whoever, with intent to defraud, passes, utters, publishes, or sells, or attempts to pass, utter, publish, or sell, or with like intent brings into the United States or keeps in possession or conceals any falsely made, forged, counterfeited, or altered obligation or other security of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Of note, the unsuspecting homeless people he’d ensnare in this scheme would lack the requisite intent to defraud, meaning the only participant in the hypothetical transaction actually committing any crime is McEntee himself.

That said, while a homeless person duped by a stunt like this would not commit a federal crime if they tried to pass a bill they believed to be genuine, that doesn’t mean they couldn’t be arrested for the attempt. Or worse, given that George Floyd was stopped for attempting to spend a counterfeit bill when he the police killed him.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that doesn’t mean they couldn’t be arrested for the attempt. Or worse, given that George Floyd was stopped for attempting to spend a counterfeit bill when he the police killed him.

precisely

demonic country

[–] D61@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago
[–] SoyViking@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the American legal system is remotely sane (which is a big if) then the important question is the intent. If you use the prop money as a prop it is not a crime but if you pass it on, deceiving people to think it is real money then you've crossed the line.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

We all know its wrong yeah

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

The thing about the American legal system is that it runs on Whose Line Is It Anyway? rules: everything's made up and the laws don't matter. What happened doesn't matter as long as the audience likes you. And the audience is rich people.

[–] drowns@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

It's probably just vice signaling. He would be terrified to actually approach a homeless person.