this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
205 points (97.2% liked)

Facepalm

3337 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would like to see thw math they did to come up with an estimate of a fucking million years. Any technological prediction farther away than 5 years means "we have no idea at all"

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

It's easy, just assume linear growth and that absolutely no new innovations will ever be thought up.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is super dumb. People always act like airplanes were just "invented" one day, especially by the Wright brothers.

This isn't the case at all, decades before there were people doing (powered) gliders and getting pretty far. Propellers were also well known at that point and a lot of people knew if you could get enough power to weight ratio you could get something that flew. Multiple people were working on small engines with a lot of output, combined with a light airframe and a death wish. Controlling the plane was also a huge challenge people were working on, which was the same for gliders and planes a like.

Sure the Wright brothers got there first, according to history, but many people followed soon after with their own designs. It was more of a humanity's capabilities to build such a thing caught up with their imagination and thus it was a thing.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

small engines with a lot of output, combined with a light airframe and a death wish

*chefs kiss*

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

George Caley helped create aero sciences and developed the forces of lift by the early 1800s. He was a towering figure of English science and couldn't get off the ground so if Real Men of Science weren't able to get it to work then it was hopeless for the common man.

After a century of countless deaths from gliders and bad parachutes, the New York Times clearly chose the easy way and said 'its just too difficult' and was banking on timid traditionalism to keep the statement true.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the new york times has always had shit takes huh

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The problematic articles varied in authorship and subject matter, but many shared a common feature

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

66 years later, Neil walked on the moon.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

9 days later, the wright brothers had their first flight.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not a mathematician, but that sounds like much less than a million years.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not for sufficiently high values of 9.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Time sure does fly

[–] essell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Requiring the efforts of Mathematicians and mechanics spending millions of man hours!

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Wright Brothers built their flying machine in a shed! With a box of bicycle parts!

[–] venoft@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And paper airplanes (and birds...) existed for ages already, someone just needed to scale it up.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well I'm not Wilbur Wright.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Guess they forgot about engineers.