this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1080 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 281 points 2 years ago (53 children)

Jesus, at this point over half the country will ban porn because of religious extremists who hate freedom. Fascism and anti free speech.

[–] Master@lemmy.world 62 points 2 years ago (2 children)

and then those same people who want it banned close their curtains and start watching it.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Like all these child protecting puritans who end up being pedophiles and sex traffickers lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

The only porn left will be yiff, because sites struggle to classify it as porn (it even makes it past google's filters). And a new generation of furries will be born. Their ban will be their undoing, lmao.

"The elder scrolls told of their return. The defeat was merely a delay."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 12 points 2 years ago

Oh, don't forget kosa, it has bipartisan support

They want to hold sites responsible for children accessing NSFW content on them. Which means ID of some kind

It would also apply to user posted content

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 189 points 2 years ago (6 children)

My parents had a porn blocker, and all it made me do was learn enough about computers to circumvent it. Even if they put age verification in front of every porn site in the world there's still torrents and chat rooms and forums all over where you can find it, and kids will find it. Next thing they'll mandate is putting toothpaste back in the tube.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Trying to stop people from doing something is a sure fire way to guarantee they will do that thing.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 78 points 2 years ago

It's not that. It's that if you tell a horny teenager that there's pictures of naked people somewhere they'll move heaven and earth to get to it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Muddobbers 46 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Not only will they find it, they'll end up going to the sketchier sites that don't do the age verification because they're not well known enough and not following the laws and they'll likely get something infected on the computer/network or worse.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 2 years ago

Not only will they find it, they’ll end up going to the sketchier sites that don’t do the age verification because they’re not well known enough and not following the laws and they’ll likely get something infected on the computer/network or worse.

It's like that time we declared a war on drugs and then there were no drugs. Wait, actually that led to a massive black market and tons of violence.

Point being, you're not gonna stop it. You're just gonna make it less safe.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Funny you should mention putting toothpaste back in a tube, because I actually helped someone do that last night. It's possible, but also a huge pain in the ass. That's not a commentary on anything besides literal toothpaste.

[–] salient_one@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would like to hear the rest of the story, please.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

When my wife insisted I put a porn blocker on the internet, I did some simple DNS tinkering, then told my son not to let his mother catch him bypassing the "blocker" I put on.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I was growing up we had the ultimate porn blocker.

Dial up internet was far too slow to load more than about half an image per hour.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stephfinitely@artemis.camp 165 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Religious zealots shouldn't be dictating what I watch, read or do.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 80 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Especially when they're watching this stuff too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 163 points 2 years ago (14 children)

America is such garbage lol. You guys should really focus on the important stuff.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (15 children)

It's garbage because brainless rednecks voted in Trump and Republicans

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] TheRobotFrog@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We're trying, but our government won't let us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Its full of evangelical Christians. That and Anglo-Saxon culture even minus the evangelical Christians is very squeamish around sex. Just look at the different attitude towards talking to kids about sex that you find in the UK and on the Continent, even the Germanic countries tend to be a lot more open about this stuff than the UK.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Its full of evangelical Christians.

That number has been shrinking for decades, while at the same time the christo-faccists are getting more pushy.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] wheresmypillow@lemmy.one 68 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I think a lot of these states are going about this wrong. We should be helping parents restrict access for their children rather than trying to verify identities of adults who likely want to remain anonymous.

[–] ShakyPerception@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I am pretty sure these laws have nothing to do with "protecting children"

[–] EighthLayer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's the same rhetoric that the UK government are using to get a backdoor on messaging apps with E2EE.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Yeah I think that's the proper route. Parents who want to restrict what their children see need to take responsibility for doing so and not try to make the government do it for them at the expense of everyone else's privacy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"You show me some lazy prick who's laying around all day watching game shows and stroking his penis and I'll show you someone who's not causing any fucking trouble"

-George Carlin

Republicans really believe shit like this and banning abortion will be successful at restoring the nuclear family... at gunpoint.

What it will really do is increase sexual assault, suicide, violence in general...

Of course that will be everyone else's fault for not submitting to their attempts at coercion correctly. Republicans insist on personal responsibility, exclusively for their many enemies and explicitly not for themselves.

The funniest bit is, they are the reason for the death of the nuclear family and the reason it won't be restored. If you give the owner class all the money out of the asses of the working citizens that would have kids, herp derp they won't have kids.

If they really wanted the "traditional American family" to come back, they need only restore tax levels to pre-reagan levels, and actually enforce them. Instead they'd rather threaten everyone for masturbating instead of making new wage slaves they can't afford to raise so Republicans can also get that dopamine hit of schadenfreude by calling them irresponsible for having kids they can't afford.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You want to restore the nuclear family? Make it financially viable for us to have one.

One of the main reasons I don’t have children is because it’s too goddamn expensive.

Also I’m sterile. But there’s nothing anyone can do about that.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fertility issues are also massively on the rise, probably just another side effect of all the pollution we let oligarchs inflict for private profit.

And ~~Nero~~ Bezos/Walton/Buffet/Koch/etc counted while humanity burned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Porn hub should make a VPN and offer it for free to people in texas They could call it VaginaPenisNards

[–] jannis@feddit.de 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 years ago

Guess a state with a big enough user base finally tried this horse shit lol.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Republican states really want everyone to be as miserable as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

From reading about the law it sounds like they are trying to take a page from CA's overreaching prop 65 law that effectively labels everything a potential carcinogen. Based on the data the main beneficiary of this are a handful of law firms. I wouldn't be surprised if this law is backed by a few law firms who smell easy money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›