this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
124 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frippa@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago

Azov: we are nazis

The West up to a couple years ago: Azov is nazi

Russia: Azov is nazi

Western media today: calling Azov "nazis" is Russian disinformation

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago

Nazism is only Nazism if it comes from the Azov Battalion of Ukraine. Otherwise it's just sparkling genocide.

[–] Rojo27@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh... I just noticed that this is the explanation all the reports are running with... yikesdoomer

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago

I trust the "vetting" from the military whose conscripting folks over the age of 40

[–] EmoThugInMyPhase@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

I really like how they got rebranded to “special forces” despite being a bunch of random militia fighters. I’m guessing it’s part of the compromise between being absorbed into the military and still being allowed to exist as an entity

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

Definitely agree with them on the second numbered point but not in the way they’d like.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Porsche 911? No, Porsche 996.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

America: "Oh my god Volodymir, are you giving our weapons to Nazis?"

Zelensky, slipping Azov into a brown paper bag: "No. Of course not."

America: "Ahh, okay, carry on then."

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait are there actually two units who use the name “Azov”? Because if so that’s even funnier.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

nah even natopedia doesn't attempt to draw this strong of a distinction. They're composed of the same people (give or take casualties and new recruits), they are the same

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azov_Brigade

They were folded into the official armed forces as a special operations battalion all the way back in 2014 (and even before that they were sanctioned by the interior department for a while). So all this guy is claiming is "we didn't give them guns before 2014", really.

[–] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

The second image is more like "mr burns? No no, i'm mr BURNS! we're two different guys"

[–] mayo_cider@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

necessary security forces vetting

they made sure that at least 2/3 of the battalion had visible nazi tattoos

[–] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The united states who famously never worked with nazis

📎