I didn't understand what you mean if you care to elaborate, but I was asking bit? As in it seems pretty obvious the Dems want to lose since we have had two corpses debate each other and the blue one didn't do to hot, and there have been seemingly no change of course from here until November.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I forgot it op already said it was a bit so thought you were asking if it was a bit.

And put in what dems keep spamming since the debate

[–] HexBeara@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago

Gotcha

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

Boo, not oniony enough wowee

You might as well post this in the News comm smh

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago

...isn't that exactly what they've been doing? Well, aside from the whole "Their barbaric and uncouth walking corpse versus our noble and majestic walking corpse" schtick

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 8 points 10 months ago

"And then we keep doing it for 30 years" - libs in the 90s

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is kind of a game of hot potato. You don't want to be the party in power when the economy fully collapses. Neither side is doing anything to fix it. Republicans make it worse by cutting taxes. Democrats make it worse by overspending. If you ran your household budget the same way, creditors would have pulled the plug years ago.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Shut the fuck up with this household budget analogy horseshit. My household budget is not a global reserve currency.

[–] WashedAnus@hexbear.net 2 points 10 months ago

Idk about you, but I don't have a currency printing press in my basement

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

So you think spending more than you earn is infinitely sustainable? Do you want the dollar to cease being the reserve currency? Because we are following the blue print for making that happen.

[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

If "rigging the election" can mean "running an unelectable candidate" then yeah they're already doing that.

[–] robinnn@hexbear.net 3 points 10 months ago

See-saw democracy: right then left oh we’re going too far left let’s go right oh no too far right, etc. Why? Because it’s fun! And no matter what, we never leave the see-saw!! What? You want us to get off and help the people trapped underneath it? But then would have to leave the see-saw, and the right side would hit the floor FOR SURE because it’s heavier.