this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
54 points (81.4% liked)

Games

39141 readers
905 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just looked at a game that is 60€ and said "I dont think its worth that and would buy now for 30, just to check it out". Then I had the idea that some publishers/devs might benefit from knowing that 1-100000 people think that the game is worth X and would buy now for that price right now. In a case like today, the additional revenue would help their financial report etc. They could make short discounts to get especially these customers or even more tailored, you need to press "buy" and confirm at that price to let the publisher know. Like suggest price on ebay.

Let me know your thoughts and if this is a terrible idea. :)

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nous@programming.dev 80 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This assumes people are rational and that what they say they are willing to pay matches what they are actually willing to pay. And that is just the people not trying to abuse the system.

[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Personally I don't think I'd advocate for OP's suggestion, but you could solve the problem by making the suggestion also a commitment for X period of time. If you make the suggestion, and the price drops within 90 days, it automatically purchases it, etc.

[–] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

And what'd you get? People putting in 0.10. Unfortunately useless, as the poster above said.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

You can put in a buy order at 0.1 for a share worth 100. You're dreaming, but you can still do it. Don't think it really qualifies as abusing the system.

[–] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

potential solution: minimum commitment 10% of original list price?

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I'm guilty of this. So many times, I'll see something at full price and say I'll wait to buy it on sale. Then it goes on sale and I don't feel like spending the money at all. Granted, I'm not trying to sway the market and screaming my bid, this is just my internal monologue. I have a backlog of games and a busy adult life, so it's not like I'm game-poor. Just regular poor.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 51 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What if it was a "notify me if this game goes to $x" instead. But the devs could still see it.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 17 points 5 months ago

That would be neat as well. :) thanks for sharing.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 months ago

That would most likely be one of the better solutions.
I think isthereanydeal works similar to that.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think it's a terrible idea but please don't take that as an insult. It would instantly be filled with $1 "bids" and the data would be useless at best. I also feel like if I was a dev, I'd feel pretty bummed about the catalogue of people who think my game isn't worth buying

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They can set a auto rejection on offers below a certain threshold, ebay does this with its make an offer.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I think that makes sense for items of finite/low quantity like eBay. Then you have to make sure your offer is at least reasonable so it beats other offers. But with an unlimited resource like software you don't have to worry about that.

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Someone would setup some third party tracker that identified the auto reject threshold and listed it for everyone, so people could low-ball just above it. Or devs would just set it to auto-reject below the listing prices.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Then it gets filled with the lowest offers. Either way, the data wouldn't be useful enough to warrant it as a standard feature. If the devs want to know, they can put up a poll or something

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

You could say the same about steam reviews.

[–] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't know how well known it is, but this sort of information is visible already on https://isthereanydeal.com/.

Click on a game and look for "Waitlist Price Distribution" under the "Stats" tab:

Thank you, I didn't know this existed!

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wishlist vs purchase is already a signal that maybe you'd benefit from a sale. Seems like it's enough. "Suggested prices" from gamers would be way too noisy to mean anything.

[–] thebigslime@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah I suspect the wishlist-discount-purchase nexus is sufficient and more reliable means to determine what the best price would be.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

No it'd get flooded with "2 dollars" or "free"

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In a perfect world, sure, but in our reality you'd just get tons of people saying they want Elden Ring for a dollar or something.

But even if it worked, it's just games getting on sale faster. Right now, you can either pay a higher price today or wait until the game gets as cheap as you want, but it might take months or years.

As for just the information, how much people would pay for a game, that's what market research if for I guess.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They could add a bid price, so that you automatically buy at a certain price level. Sure, you could bid 0.10, but they'd probably never actually take it. And that way, they could know how much money is laying on the table. If there's a thousand bids for $50, that gives them a pricing signal.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This sounds like it would just end up speedrunning Steam's refund system. Plus, I don't think it's desirable for the seller. If they feel their game is worth some price, but a bunch of people know they can bully other developers into a race to the bottom, that could easily be a negative feedback loop.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 5 months ago

Exactly my thought. Thank you for pointing that out.

[–] tinwelint@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 months ago

I think that would be abused pretty quickly to get games sold at 60+ down to 1 or less.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

Seeing how many devs ignore suggested regional pricing unless steam autofills it for them, nobody would enable this on their own, and you can't make this sort of thing opt out.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ah yes Gamers™ would never abuse a system like that. There is a reason why many publishers have abandoned regional pricing, the loss in revenue is bigger than any gains they would make. Remember they are in it for profit maximization not customer base maximization. They rather sell 10 copies for 60 than a 1000 copies for 60 cents.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

I think a good alternative would be is have the system, but have the developer provide a Target price listing of what they're expecting and anything that's significantly under that listing gets ignored

For example many people didn't feel like frostpunk 2 was worth the release pricing and that they thought it was easily more worth around $30 instead of the 45 it released at, so Gamers could suggest that they're not buying it because the price is too high and they could provide that $30 price point, unless that $30 price point is below the Target price that the developer has set as the minimum listing, it would be part of the metric. This would filter out the people who are abusing the system because there's no point in using the system dishonorably because you don't know if your metric is going to actually count where are the people who are you using it genuine and not doing obvious troll responses would not be filtered out because realistically they should be within the developers Target.

It's not like these people are saying I would pay a dollar for this game when the games worth $40, they're saying that they believe the price is too steep in that $30 is a much better cost point than 45.

They could even add a little bit of financial advantage onto it, by optionally having it so you can Mark a price point at what you'd be willing to purchase it at and if the developer ends up dropping it to that price point it, it alerts the user much like how eBay does with the suggest a price feature

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 6 points 5 months ago

I believe publishers already have good control over their prices. If they feel a game isn’t selling to the extent they wish, they lower the price. If it’s selling well, then they have no need to lower the price.

It’s market economy.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

If I have to price it, I'm going to price it at $1.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The action of not buying something signals the price is too high. Sales numbers vs sales expectations are the only metric that really matter.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It's a very unclear signal as there's a bunch of other possibilities too. Maybe I already have a similar game I prefer, maybe I don't like the genre, ...

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like camelcamelcamel but for games.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There actually already is steamdb which does that exact thing. The reason I suggested it is because probably all would benefit from it.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Imo isthereanydeal does the price tracking more useful.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Buy the game, try it for 2 hours, don't like it at its current price? Refund it. Pretty sure when you refund the game you can leave that feedback, dunno if devs would ever see it though.

[–] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm thinking of a "make offer" option where the customer can choose any price and the dev can manually choose to sell to that customer for that price or not.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sounds awful. A million people spamming 1 cent on all games

[–] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Lmao

I guess a minimum order thingy could be set but then the lowest offer would be spammed.

Then games with the offer option would be seen as bad or cash-grabby.

So the option should be to get un-broke and pay full price or wait until winter.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago
[–] mbinn@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago

Also, if you wait long enough, those games become heavily discounted during seasonal sales.