this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
351 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70365 readers
3513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lofgren's bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and "similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers"; DNS providers that offer service "exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols"; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 144 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Really uh...

Setting themselves up for success uh..

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 92 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Great to see our representatives finally focusing on the real issues in these difficult times.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 134 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Democrats: "Please for the love of God, don't vote for us ever again! We really, really don't want to win."

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

D E M O C R A T singular, one. Not democrats. For fucks sake it's on the bloody title!

Why are people so willfully ignorant?

US Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) today proposed ...

[–] Vinstaal0@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Cause people fail to awknowledge there is more to politics than just left and right, or progressive and conservative, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Lemmy: "Fuck that, I'll vote blue no matter who. You can't tell me what to do"

Democrats:

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 90 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The country is being burned to the ground from the inside by fascists, and this is the hill Democrat politicians choose to die on?!! Holy shit! What a fucking joke!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Corporate dictatorship masquerading as "democracy"

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The shepherd and the dog might be in agreement.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 61 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Democrats: why won't anyone vote for us?

Also Democrats: let's be like the Republicans, they get so many votes! Let's miss the entire point of democracy and just support large companies!

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Because they want the big money donors more than they want to win. Their campaigns are above all designed to bring in money for the high-priced consultants.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 3 months ago

Lofgren is a corporate stooge is the message I'm getting.

[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 47 points 3 months ago

This somehow reads with the same energy as those "please don't download scientific papers for free from , that would be so terrible" posts.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

77 year old who has been in the house since the 90s. Actually a prime example of why we need term limits and real competition in elections (if not from GOP, at least in primaries). Irony is she reps a district that isn't really associated with streaming or producing movies.

My guess? She won her primary because she was the incombent or was unopposed, but she probably receives cash from the film industry. Almost all house seats are uncompetitive unless someone drops out or gets redistricted. Until something changes, this is and will be the way our government continues to work.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

in power since the 90s

Oh so carrying the torch for the LAST time they tried to go after media with the moral panic of "Explicit" music label stuff led by Tipper Gore? The one where Twisted Sister showed up in 1985. A continuation from when they had a panic about VHS recordings in 1969 and Mr Rogers testified.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I specially went Obama over Clinton because she was still saying in 2008 how video games promote violence. There's a certain type of Dem, and they're still ramming them down our throats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago

Democrats once again losing on purpose.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sometimes I feel like democrats don't actually care more about voters, they just care much more about appearances.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Idk man, that sounds like evidence based thinking to me, reported.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

And rich people

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Man we really got trounced in that election "

"Yeah we should really work on our image"

"Yeah. Oh I know! You know how everyone hated that tik tok ban?"

"Yeah?"

"Well what if that, but more!"

"But people hated the ban...."

"Oh right, no, the movie industry is paying us to do this."

"Oh why didn't you just say so."

[–] Euphorazine@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

On the one hand, more Dems voted no on tiktok ban

On the other hand, you can bet any bipartisan bill is not in the interest of the American people

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If they are not blocking the access to the WHO.is servers you can get the IP address of the site and add it to your local hosts file.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 months ago

oh cool, tackling the key issues facing us right now

[–] mwguy 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is the capability to block any website something the Democrats want to enable with for Trump to abuse?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago

Yes, then they can blame him for it but still get paid by the oligarchs who wanted the bill.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Seriously.

This is a shit shit back to front now.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Article 1) Streaming prices going up Article 2) websites being blocked

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

This is some dumb shit.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

These people were everyone's hope? LMAO 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

invest in VPN providers

I'm guessing lofgren has already done that

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait until they start "the VPN wars". it's invariable at this point. Only the VPN that has bribed The Emperor the most will survive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)

its uh, definitely one of the feelings of all time reading through threads like this, assuming these are actual real people, spending their actually real time, talking about these actually real things.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cockroaches using the government to make oppressive laws. I think I'm still ancap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm missing the part where consumers are required to use their ISP DNS. I never do, in favour of CloudFlare DNS, Google DNS, etc

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michaelc@social.rootaccess.org 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

@some_guy is there such a thing as an open source dns and encrypted DNS? Or federated DNS?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It sort if have to be. In the end there has to be one source of truth for each TLD, otherwise who is to say who owns foo.com, and what it resolves to?

And then the same structure for assigning TLD ownership.

But there is nothing stopping you from running another DNS service, call it DNS2 with different root servers, etc. It is just going to be extemely hard to convince people to use it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I use a self hosted pihole for DNS. It needs an upstream DNS server for resolving unchached dns's. I have pihole point to quad9 then cloudflair then google then I have it point to a bunch of unfiltered DNS servers across the world.

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pihole also let's you install unbound. Your own recursive resolver. So you don't have to rely on google or quad9 etc.

https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

They're absolutely is, it's called onion routing, get around DNS blocks with tor as long as you know where you're going.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

This is some fascist (& not at all surprising) shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›