Fuck AI

Not exactly AI being used, rather developed, but Meta's torrenting 80tb of books and not seeding is egregious

I'm a university prof in a medical science field. We hired a new, tenure-line prof to teach introductory musculoskeletal anatomy to prepare our students for the more rigorous, full systems anatomy that's taught by a different professor. We learned (too late, after a year) that they used AI to generate the slides they used in lecture and never questioned/evaluated the content. Had an entire cohort of students fail the subsequent anatomy course after that.

But in my mind, what's worse is that the administration did nothing to correct the prof, and continues to push a pro-AI narrative in order for us to spend less time investing resources in teaching.

the IDF using it to carry out airstrikes on Palestinians https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the_Gaza_Strip

Flooding the internet with slop.

Maybe "favorite example" isn't the best phrasing for the question, but I get the sentiment and would have to say using AI to create porn of real people as a means of blackmail.

I Used to Teach Students. Now I Catch ChatGPT Cheats

https://thewalrus.ca/i-used-to-teach-students-now-i-catch-chatgpt-cheats

Students using it as a way to avoid actually learning and learning how to think for themselves. Also for being yet another soul-crushing blow for already under-paid, under-respected, under-attack teachers.

Mass consumption of copyright works for training, but still considering individuals doing it to be criminals.

Not supervising your Tesla properly and running over people.

Weren't the stupid cunts at UHC using AI to kill old people?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/unitedhealth-lawsuit-ai-deny-claims-medicare-advantage-health-insurance-denials/

Thank you for asking actual humans instead of an LLM 😊 Here’s my favourite example, and it’s worth digging into more: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/03/10/foreign-policy-the-u-k-pivot-to-ai-is-doomed-from-the-start/

Is erotic roleplay 'unethical'? Because we got a lot of services for that.

Once you are so quick to offer it for military purposes, and profit maximization over any ethical concerns, then it becomes not just warmongering evil maximization, and battlefield domination that encourages warmongering evil, you also need to maximize AI's disinformation of public, as media is used now, to support the warmongering evil maximization.

Any humanist principles, ethics to promote humanism, cannot coexist with warmongering maximalism. Profit prefers the latter. Learning that your views might not align with warmongering maximalism, may be used for voter suppression extending to murder by exploding electronics. AI/LLM identification of insufficient loyalty to warmongering and genocide is a key tool in ensuring agenda maximalism.

I’m late but whatever.

Well considering that all generative ai models are built off of vast sums of stolen work there can be no ethical use of generative ai. Since any use of generative ai supports the theft of human made works. No generative ai model is built off of properly licensed work that pays the original creators for said work. Anyone arguing that this type of ai can be used is ethical ways is just wrong since it ignores the impacts to real people that allowed for the model to be made in the first place. The sheer amount of data required to build a LLM would cost too much money to obtain legally so these companies just steal and are hoping that they can just get away with it. Even Adobe, whose model comes closest, still used work that was not licensed for this purpose by using their back catalog of stock images to feed into their model.

That is ignoring the vast environmental impact through the amount of energy consumption required to run the model.