this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
740 points (95.2% liked)

Political Memes

8625 readers
3256 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 140 points 2 months ago (6 children)

if Democrats ever win I fully exepct this:

"Now is a time of healing. To better unify our Great Nation™®© we are going to let Republicans fill every committee and pick every judge, we are even looking into how we might let them have the presidency. If we can't, do not worry, we will behave as if we were Republicans and will do as they wish."

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think Bernie's Fight the Oligarchy Tour is changing this, but more people needs to push this.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

So is David Hogg, the new Vice Chair of the DNC. He’s a Gen-Z school shooting survivor who’s committed to primary out the centrists and turn them into a real opposition party.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

Once Newsom is in CECOT he will have plenty of time to think about what he could have done.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yea, the "democrats" will want to "reach across the table" and work with these fucking traitors. Why? Because most of them are likely in on it.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They take the same money from the same corporations. They don’t care if they win or lose an election.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jonne 15 points 2 months ago

Yep, that's what Obama did with the Bush people and the people that caused the GFC. And now all these people are back for round 2 with nothing learned (well, they learned there are no consequences no matter what they do).

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Fucking hate how true this is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 78 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There isn't going to be another government or another free election until the current regime is put to the sword.

If it isn't entirely obvious that's the next play, I agree.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Agree. But who will do that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's literally the opposite of what the Dem leadership ever does. Expecting them to put the outcomes for regular people over system rules and norms (and their owner donors) is like expecting a sheep to become an obligate carnivore.

Neoliberals don't change the system, they ARE the system. You're not going to get systemic change from someone whose raison d'être is protecting the norms and rules at all costs.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

old guard dems are just GOP in disguise, because they often work together behind the scenes making deals, they both of the same megadonors, additionally they hope to get by being "not-republican" candidates.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nope.

Dems try to adhere to The Rules And Procedures

Pubs don't give a shit

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That first part is kinda what I'm saying: Dems adhere to the rules and procedures even when it prevents them from taking completely reasonable actions that the people who they're supposed to represent want.

Republicans break all rules and norms to do awful things and Dems refuse to break any rules or norms to stop them.

It's like a fistfight where one fighter is wielding a sawed off shotgun and the other refuses to even fight dirty.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Well this is the bitch: you can't play that game. Because the whole point of that game to smash the rules of order. To destroy the social contract. To create chaos and revoke rights. Any move you make is a win for them and a loss for everyone else.

Don't play chess with pigeons

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That's a false dichotomy.

You're assuming that the only alternative to slavishly adhering to the rules as determined by people who could not possibly predict today's circumstances is to ignore the very concept of rules and procedure.

I'm not advocating for Dems to do either. I'm advocating for them to change the rules for the better when they can and to bend or even outright break them when it's necessary and justified.

Following rules for their own sake even when it's clearly contrary to the needs and wants of the people is just a more socially acceptable form of authoritarianism.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 33 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Start by sending a handful of Republican Senators and Congressfolk to El Salvador.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

They would need to grow spines first.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Democrats are centrist liberals. They are capitalists. They are cop-loving authoritarians. They will never fulfill your leftist liberatory desires. Stop deferring your political will to wishes they will never manifest. You have Stockholm Syndrome. Go do something yourself that matters to you in your own community.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well said, I'm still going to post my opinions but there's really nothing you've said that I can refute.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I should probably add: I don't mean to be a dick. I say all this stuff because I care, I hate seeing comrades efforts and dreams and desires frustrated by this deadend political party year after year, election after election. I imagine if all the passion we drained into the DNC instead went into creative modes of organization and direct action in our own towns and cities?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

Is this how liberals fantasize about revolutionary action while still staying as milk toast as possible?

Edit: I appreciate Lemmy for the simple fact that I can use "liberal" in any sub and not be considered a conservative by default when I'm criticizing that perspective.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Pandora’s box is opened, and once that happens, it’s almost impossible to close it. I’m going to be honest, the next election cycle, I’ll consider voting for the blue equivalent of Trump. Now that we know presidents can act like kings, it’s time progressives capitalized on that. Why not lock up rightwingers and hatemongers, slap tariffs on oil, and deport Zionists in order to fight Islamophobia?

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Presidents can act like kings if they have the Legislative and Judicial branches in their pocket. No progressive ever will.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 18 points 2 months ago

Presidential immunity gives a democratic incumbent the right to slap a republican senator daily

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Sorry, I get the spirit of the meme and it’s nice to daydream but fuck no. I don’t trust the Democrats to do anything in the interest of the people.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not whether you trust one absolutely or not.

It's always, as ever, relative. You pick between the options for the best bad option or you abdicate your vote and then must suffer (potentially) the worst of both worlds.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

What I mean is I don’t want the Democrats to go hog wild with the law the same way the Republicans are because they are also owned by the Capitalists. Since I don’t have another choice of course I’m very likely to Vote Blue No Matter Who™️ to my great displeasure, unless a more progressive party takes the lead by a landslide and actually has a good chance of winning

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (7 children)

A Democrat would never do it. You'd need an actual Leftist. They'd be the only ones with enough spine to sacrifice their own political career and reputation to get it done.

Yeah, but a bj in the oval office? I mean, have you met Hilary???

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They'd just have rolled it all back on Jan 21.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I mean, there was plenty of time between November and Jan 21 to rendition 3 justices, anyone in Congress tied to Russian money, the entire trump campaign and all of the Republican money middlemen that launder Russian money for political campaigns

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ButteryNickel@lemmy.wtf 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You think the laws will be fair? Check out how they're going to give Trump a 3rd term but keep Obama ineligible.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You right, they would have said the president is a powerless figure head on Monday and on Tuesday they would have a coronation. Full military parade.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If we manage to have another presidential election, I will be behind any progressive or Democrat that promises to use the presidency in the exact way as Trump.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Forcing an rewritten version of the Constitution that eliminates flaws and loopholes, enacting term and age limits on all elected offices and the judiciary, deleting the electoral college, and so forth?

I am in.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

The US needs a proportional voting system first and foremost

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At this point the main priority for the democrats has to be reforming the American voting system.

First past the post needs to go away, permanently.

It is ridiculous to have situations where a state population votes 51% for one candidate and 49% for the other, while the state as a whole gets to throw out the 49% of the other candidate.

Once that happens, other parties will spring up and actually have a possible way to get elected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“If” doing some heavy lifting there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's rather optimistic assuming that Republicans would act like they gave a shit about rule of law if they were the ones who wrote them. Laws are just for everyone else, in their minds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A. The Trump administration is breaking the law.

Yes, we know the rules are rigged. The system is dysfunctional. Breaking more things? Not gonna help! We have to get serious about creating something new. We need clear and fair rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›