this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
235 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3822 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 91 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, fuck off, how very dare you suggest such a thing you horrid bastard you, just you wait, I’m going to punch you in the elbow and knock over your second-favourite house plant for insinuating such lies

[–] mudstickmcgee@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey. You don't talkt to op like this you fucking degenerate piece of shit, we're all being nice to each other!

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've blocked both of you idiots

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 75 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Here's the thing.

The last 10 years have proven that organized online hostility is VERY EFFECTIVE at dictating public opinion.

That's how we got the new fascist movements. Trump and the like. Because right wing hostility and bigotry went not only unchecked institutionally but unchallenged socially.

No solution has emerged for that from an institutional level.

So yeah, my socialist ass is fighting back. I'll be damned if I'm going to spend the rest of my life under these fucking wastes of flesh and their bullshit antiquated opinions. I'm done taking it and I'm done tolerating it. Fuck every last republican and homophobe and transphobe and complicit liberal. All of them. And wouldn't you know it, little by little they're backing down when we stand up to them like the cowards they are.

Yes, I am deliberately far more hostile online, because it WORKS. And clearly nobody with institutional control cares enough to try anything else.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’ve always been a terse asshole.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Your mother is a hamster. >:(

[–] mudstickmcgee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At least my father doesn't smell like elderberries

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] kyle@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck you and I'll see you tomorrow!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 weeks ago

Who the fuck says I'm hostile ? Fuck you

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“Why are online discussions about politics more hostile than offline discussions?
A popular answer argues that human psychology is tailored for face-to-face interaction and people’s behavior therefore changes for the worse in impersonal online discussions…
Across eight studies, leveraging cross-national surveys and behavioral experiments (total N = 8,434), we test the mismatch hypothesis but only find evidence for limited selection effects.
Instead, hostile political discussions are the result of status-driven individuals who are drawn to politics and are equally hostile both online and offline.
Finally, we offer initial evidence that online discussions feel more hostile, in part, because the behavior of such individuals is more visible online than offline.”

This fits with our understanding of personality disorders, which is that they are a small percentage of our society—around 10.5 percent, according to the recent DSM-5-TR.3

I try to avoid all politics online because it's all raging and it's honestly depressing that 10.5% can dominate a space like that.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then you probably won't like the thought that an even smaller percentage of people who think they need to get ever richer and control ever more aspects of ever more people's lives are basically ruining our offline world.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago

I would prefer a star trek utopia, that's for sure.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

fuck no we aren't.

anyone who says otherwise can fight me.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I'm pissed that you got to this comment first!

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They both seem like assholes to me 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

IMO, the reason is because scientists haven't found a way to punch someone in their face over the internet yet.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I've long thought that phones needed a taze button. Every telephone in the world should have the power to deliver a high power electric shock to the user, and the phone network should only allow the callee to taze the caller. So if you call someone, the person you have called can taze you.

I don't see any problem with the telephone network that can't be solved by putting a 30,000 volt potential across the caller's jaw. Make it work on call bots too, if a computer automatically calls you and you don't want it to, put Shearon Harris on the line. Modern problems require 2nd Amendment solutions, and if you elect me as your president in 2028 it is these policies that I shall energetically enact.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They send SWAT teams to their houses, which is pretty close.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 20 points 2 weeks ago
[–] AugustWest@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Back in the day I just assumed everyone was lying. Or trying to get people worked up, and we called them trolls.

Learning how to ignore the trolls, and not having trust for strangers on the internet, coupled with the ability to basically not care what random people said is a lost art.

Somehow people forgot to give other the people this memo, including the "you don't fucking join social networks as your self". Anonymity makes this all work.

Eternal September newbies just didn't get it.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the differences these days is that marginalized groups are having their existences threatened… and not hollow threats, but meaningful ones that have had, and continue to have, very real consequences in the form of policies, hate crimes, etc.

That is legitimate, very real violence, and it results in very understandable hostility. And then those perpetuating, supporting, and celebrating the violence pretend they are victims when people treat them like the orcs they are.

“Why are you being so divisive?” “You’re not very TOLERANT of different opinions, are you?” “Why are you so angry all the time, snowflakes?”

Violent bullies need to be put in their place, and with more than just “hostility on the internet”.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I have. I honestly try not to be. There's just so many uncaring shits online. It makes me sick to think of how fucked up these trolls are to relish causing others distress. Then I become a dick

I'm trying to be better

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There’s just so many uncaring shits online.

I wonder how much "hate" on the internet is this... but the reality is that is how you "see" them in your head rather than what they're actually saying/believe. A lot of negative responses to some of the things I say is a strawman of what I actually believe/said.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Someone hacked a roomba last year to yell the N word at people on a mic.

The WORLD has become more hateful, it is not simply perception.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I went to high school in the south, I'm not white.

The hate is not something you can process, the worst we see online, the Andrew tates, the people calling for all brown people to be deported to El Salvador, that's Disney compared to them.

Becauae it was all they had, and the hate infused them down to the cells, such that it was all they had keeping them going.

Trump took the lid off, let them feel more comfortable talking in public.

But these are people who casually discuss how the only way to heal the world is to exterminate all the Muslims and jews, how we should nuke China now because we can, and how atheists and anybody more left than Trump needs to be castrated now for the good of America.

To people shocked at the toxicity, I think you grew up in far more sheltered places.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Okay? I never said "ALL HATE on the internet is bullshit"... I said "I wonder how much is just people constructing shit in their own head."

This is exactly my point. You chose to interpret my words in a way that I clearly would have never intended if you actually spent time to read the words and understand them for what they were rather than some magical interpretation that clearly was never said.

Edit: Thanks for the downvote too! Proves the point further.

Edit2: And on your specific point I would argue otherwise. In the past, humans would just kill each other rather than yelling words through a machine. Literal murder -> Mean words is a de-escalation. We can do better for sure... do not misconstrue that, but to claim that we're more hateful now, when history shows us murdering each other for less is a bit silly of a stance to take.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago

No, we're just done with things like the orange man nazis, advertising, paywalls, borders, illegal for thee but not for me billionaires.

Bit once that's fixed we'll go back to clicking on links to help prince Abu Abowah of Nigeria to settle his bank account once and for all.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

IMO online commenters are increasingly showing pathological binary thinking - the attitude that there are exactly two sides to every issue - the Right one and the Wrong one. Questioning ANY aspect of the Right one means you're obviously a hardcore supporter of EVERY aspect of the Wrong one. You're either morally and ethically pure or your character is a wretched hive of scum and villainy. To me it's a really paradoxical way of thinking about diversity and acceptance - more like we're supposed to either wholeheartedly embrace people or despise them.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seems to be a positive trend happening. Instead of just nothing but toxic trolls. People are starting to push back on the mindless bullshit that is ruining the world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Enzy@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No I just hate you all equally

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

What a terrible headline. All of us? No. Next.

[–] C45513@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, and it's a good thing. The Paradox of Tolerance. If we want a world where people are free to choose and believe and live unique and different lives, we cannot stand by and do nothing while intolerant assholes live their lives.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago

I go more for 'tiresomely cynical', but whatever.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I’ve been facing a lot more personal harassment over disagreements on the internet that should never lead to that level of harassment. Like taking photos of me from my profile, photoshopping them, sharing them labeled as a pedophile because of my appearance, and Last weekend I had an angry racist threaten to dox me to my employer that I— called out racism?— trying to get me fired.

I feel like the paid trolls have gotten really aggressive since the election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

yes and i don’t think it’s limited to politics either.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This fits with our understanding of personality disorders, which is that they are a small percentage of our society—around 10.5 percent, according to the recent DSM-5-TR.3

Idk, I consider 10% to be pretty high. If you add in selection bias, you could get an actual majority in a community having personality disorders just because the non-jerks largely self-select themselves out.

That said, I still think the conclusions here shouldn't be taken at face value. The data was from surveys, and while I haven't read their methodology, I would certainly hesitate to accept results of a survey for something like this (and for <10k responses). I personally find I'm more confrontational online, though I hope I'm generally still way more respectful than your common jerk.

The results are certainly interesting though.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It depends on what communities you subscribe to. You’re not going to get much hostility in a gardening sub, but you will get it in political sub. With that said, my reddit score is very polite. Always has been. My secret is being aware of my emotions and not responding when I’m being egged.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you even check to see if that ivy you planted is invasive? You're probably ruining your local ecosystem you piece of shit.

Also what kind of basic bitch plants basic Roma tomatoes? Garbage choice, when Purple Cherokee are so much better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

No fucking shit we are. How did you crack that nut, Einstein?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Next question, you SOB!

[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 5 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I think there are two sides to this. Yes, online aggression has probably peaked in recent years with the rise of worldwide pro far-right misinformation campaigns, no argument there. They were specifically targeted at the people more vulnerable to buy into hate speech propaganda.

On the other hand, I have personally noticed more constructive discussions, even after I deleted most of my anti-social media accounts and substantialy decreased my usage of Internet forums in general. It seems there's some positive trend in the middle of all that.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›