This will be solved by defunding the research.
this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
211 points (98.6% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
3214 readers
80 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Racism wouldn't be so bad if people wouldn't talk about it so much"
- idiot ex friend
Banned in the EU not Europe. For example, the UK has not banned Titanium Dioxide, and published it's own review in 2024. It concluded "that it is unlikely that there would be a risk to health from current UK dietary exposures of E171 TiO2.
Source: UK Committee on Toxicity
Also the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) did not conclude that Titanium Dioxide is unsafe but rather that it "could not exclude genotoxicity concerns after consumption of titanium dioxide particles." In other words, as it couldn't exclude the possibility of genotoxicity it has essentially used the precautionary principle to ban it.
So it's nuanced and not quite as dramatic as the article is making out. Scientific evidence may make it clearer that it is genotoxic in humans or even that it is safe. Personally I'm not a fan of adding any unnecessary materials to foods like this and think the EFSA's approach is better when it comes to public health, but I'd say there are far more obvious issues with US foods than this particular additive. Hormone treated beef and chlorinated chicken are two obvious examples.
Banned in the EU not Europe. For example, the UK
Good thing they left the European Union so they could have blue passports and toxic additives!
The UK has stricter food standards than the EU anyway.
Got some examples?
Sow stalls are completely banned in UK, partially in EU. UK bans piglet castration. Various pesticides.
The picking of cherries, however, not so closely regulated ;p
UK has stricter food standards...
Maybe for food safety, but not for taste or presentation! Hard to fail food safety when you only eat cardboard!!
Read before commenting, please...
This is all a joke and I hope you took it in stride. I couldn't help but dunk on the trope of tasteless UK food. I meant no harm! ❤️
The US doesn't really chlorinate chicken anymore, and it never did in the way "chlorinated chicken" implies.
It was common and is still permitted to wash chicken in the processing plant using a diluted bleach solution to eliminate any microbe contamination followed by a water rinse.
This is very similar to the sanitizer solution used in restaurants in both the US and Europe to clean the plates you eat off of.
No one in the EU ever claimed that it was a harmful practice on it's own. The solution has also been replaced basically everywhere with a solution of vinegar and hydrogen peroxide, since it's comparably effective and breaks down to water and oxygen relatively quickly. It's also extremely diluted. (0.2%)
The EUs concerns are that an antimicrobial wash is masking unsanitary practices further up the supply line, and that better results are achieved by maintaining hygiene throughout the entire supply chain.
It's just as accurate to say that most Europeans are drinking chlorinated water, and eating chlorinated seafood. (Drinking water is usually treated to around 1ppm, with food sanitizer being recommended to aim for 50 ppm and then holding at 5ppm. Wild caught seafood can't meet the end to end hygiene requirements the EU aims for, so processing with a sanitizer rinse is permitted)
It's another case of people simplifying the nuance of the disagreement, because it's harder to discuss when there's no clear better answer.
One clarification, because I happen to work with it: the hydrogen peroxide and vinegar (acetic acid) react to form peracetic acid (PAA, aka peroxyacetic acid/POAA), which is a stronger oxidizer than hydrogen peroxide. It is indeed used at many US poultry facilities.
Always the fine line to try to walk of "how much detail is right". :).
Hoped to convey "disagreement is over process, not materials", "what we used to use was safe, but we switched to something just as effective that's safer for workers, and even less chance of residue", and some examples beyond the EU food safety commission saying it's about process to show that it's about process.
Just don't want people to keep thinking Americans are eating contaminated chicken. It's just not guaranteed to not need a disinfecting rinse
Our review found there is currently no evidence to suggest dietary exposure to food-grade titanium dioxide is a concern for human health.
worth noting that the EU banning this kicked off similar investigations in at least the UK, Australia/New Zealand, and Canada and none of them concluded that titanium dioxide is harmful… the EU is an outlier here, and not just because nobody else has followed up
https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/foodtech/Review-of-titanium-dioxide-as-a-food-additive
Our review found there is currently no evidence to suggest dietary exposure to food-grade titanium dioxide is a concern for human health.
Shit. Is it still allowed in sunscreen?
Are you eating the sunscreen?
No
Still not sure how that snarky response applies though. Last I checked, skin is porous and creams get absorbed by the skin. So I'd say it's still a valid concern.
It depends on the size of the particle and what the particle is made of, titanium dioxide is not capable of penetrating your skin because it’s a solid and the solid particles are too large for direct absorption, something touching your skin in cream form does not actually mean it will definitely penetrate through your skin. Titanium is by its self considered a body safe metal, and dioxide means it contains two oxygen atoms and one atom of the main ingredient, titanium is a particularly large atom. This doesn’t mean that titanium dioxide should be being applied directly to the mucus membranes in your body, like in your intestines, but skin is significantly less permeable. Titanium dioxide in sunscreen is considered safe, it is not banned from use in the EU in sunscreens, it’s also considered environmentally safe, which is untrue of nonmineral sunscreens
Don’t eat titanium dioxide but that doesn’t mean it’s not good for other things.
Ooooo boy, you don't know what you're missing! Its like glue, but less stigma for not being a crafting supply.
Its also used in most toothpastes, and often paired with zinc oxide in things like sunscreen and baby creams, but zinc mostly uses the non-nano particle ones.
OK I saw this on an bottle of SPF 30 sunscreen. Its older though. FYI I don't buy the whole TikTok shit about sunscreen conspiracies, so I am not denying the effectiveness and purpose of sunscreen.
Should I make an report? Is it safe for skin?
Titanium dioxide acts as a physical block from the sun, it reflects and scatters the harmful parts of sunlight, it’s pretty common in mineral sunscreen. Applying it topically would not cause the same effects as ingesting it would.
Thank you!
Maybe RFK Jr will do one good thing by accident.