this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
52 points (100.0% liked)

California

1740 readers
27 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/181313

The shell of a burned car in front of a home that narrowly missed the Pacific Palisades fire earlier this year.


From NYT > Top Stories via this RSS feed

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sounds like, at least with the prior rate hike, it's not a flat increase, but reflects risk in a given area: higher risk areas are seeing larger hikes.

https://uphelp.org/state-farm-raising-insurance-rates-20-for-california-customers-in-new-year/

Joel Laucher from United Policyholders, a consumer advocacy group, says folks should shop around for coverage amid the changes.

“Really the way that plays out, it may be a 3% or 4% rate increase for someone in a more urban and less wildfire exposed area. And it could be a 40% or a 50% rate increase for the population that owns homes in [wildfire impacted areas],” he said.

That variability is probably what you'd expect if the increase is economically-efficient, but just saying that someone may be more-impacted or less-impacted than the given percent increase.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good news for Californians. Yeah, price hikes suck, but the combination of climate change and inflation has caused average annual home repairs to go way up - it's this, or else the companies just drop everyone in the state, and no one can have home insurance.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

State managed insurance would probably be fine for California.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I ‘d prefer to see state managed electrical first. After all, PG&E is the one that keeps burning down everything in the state.

[–] GoTime@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

So now they cover fire damage, yes?

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

As someone who has spent a stupid account of time on property insurance in the last few years, for family and for work, I actually support allowing the price increase. Our insurance was so insanely cheap for a long time, and prices were regulated so carriers couldn't increase prices. Well, it became unprofitable, partly due to the wildfires. Carriers just withdrew from California completely. It left a huge hole in the market that is filled with surplus-lines / out of state insurers and their prices seem to be completely unregulated and unreasonable.

Like the shittist neighbor ever, US insurance is therrree