this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
546 points (99.1% liked)

politics

24338 readers
3112 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

Tonight @ 9: Conservative blames anyone or anything except themselves for their problems.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Her medical documents did in fact say abortion, she had an abortion. Use whatever mental gymnastics she wants, but factually - She had an abortion, the very thing they have and are wanting to ban.

Any person with even the smallest spark in their brain going through this can figure this out.

There are thousand of abortions performed every day on people who want to be a parent more than anything in the world, people going through IVF and fertility treatments have a high chance of ectopic pregnancies. If you actually understand this, it's obvious how insane she is.

[–] Handmaid@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She's not stupid. She's using the media to manipulate stupid people so that her party remains in power. She knows exactly what a hypocrite she is, and she doesn't care. These people don't actually stand for anything other than wealth and power.

[–] GasMeterCrasher@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

THIS. She's dug herself into a hole and can't dig out. Only choice is to dig deeper and fuck everyone else.

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I read the WSJ article and she is absolutely infuriating. Her reasoning contains several fallacies:

False Cause:

"It was absolute fearmongering at its worst"

She blames political messaging instead of considering that vague legal language created legitimate professional uncertainty.

Straw Man:

"There will be some comments like, 'Well, thank God we have abortion services,' even though what I went through wasn't an abortion"

This is particularly frustrating. Advocates aren't celebrating her needing an "abortion", they're pointing out her experience is exactly what they predicted: doctors hesitating due to legal uncertainty. She had to argue with staff, pull up laws on her phone, and call the governor's office during a medical emergency. That's the system breakdown advocates warned about, not a misunderstanding of medical definitions.

False Dilemma:

"We have turned the conversation about women's healthcare into two camps: pink hats and pink ribbons. It's either breast cancer or abortion."

This drastically oversimplifies complex healthcare policy into just two opposing sides and the irony is staggering. It's like a company ignoring safety advocates' warnings about a confusing manual, then when accidents happen, blaming those advocates for 'scaring' workers instead of fixing the manual.

She lived the very scenario abortion rights advocates had been warning about all along, yet somehow, in her mind, the problem isn’t the law, it’s the people who tried to stop it from hurting her in the first place.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

She should have stood by her religious and political principles, and just rode it out. It was God's, and MAGA's, will to put her through that ordeal, and he expected her to accept her fate.

Instead, she defied The MAGA Lord and fought to have a Democratic abortion. She's a Democrat now, destined for an eternity in a fiery torturous Hell. May God have mercy on her damned Democratic Soul.

/S, nobody really believes that nonsense.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

As someone raised by conservatives, they absolutely do believe such nonsense. Remove the sarcasm, and you sound exactly like my dad.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

I didn’t realize there were pro-lifers that accepted “it’s not an abortion if the fetus wasn’t going to be viable”. You could pretty easily extend that to full term. Hell with medical debt, I don’t see how there’s much chance in a lot of cases even post partum.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cult members will never blame their beliefs, they'll just perform mental gymnastics to blame critics.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have to wonder if the Doctors weren't trolling her a bit. She had an ectopic pregnancy at 5 weeks. Not only is the abortion necessary, it was within the six-week limit, so it was perfectly legal on all counts. So why would they claim they were confused about the law?

I suspect they wanted to teach an arrogant Florida Republican a lesson about politics encroaching on the medical decisions between a doctor and their patient, and made her jump through a bunch of hoops first, just to make her feel the fear, anxiety, anger, and frustration of the average citizen whose medical care is being dictated by MAGA Nazis.

Remember, we are only hearing the side of a professional MAGA Nazi, so she's a proven liar.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

That would have some significant medical ethics issues. She nearly died. Do no harm, and that's regardless of the patient's political ideology.

[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The 5 weeks pregnant vs 6 week ban is a bit more ambiguous than you might think.

The Florida 6 week ban calculates the 6 weeks from the first day of the last menstrual period, not from fetal size or date of conception. https://abortiondefensenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Florida-April-2025-2-1.pdf

In general, ovulation occurs 12-17 days into the menstrual cycle. Florida's ban is more like a 3 to 4 week ban than a 6 week.

Edit: spelled ban as can once

[–] wicked@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

"roughly five weeks"

Since weeks are counted from the beginning of her last period, not conception, this operation must have happened within one week of her missed period. Perhaps it wasn't so clearly within the law.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 136 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately, stupid breeds too fast for nature to fix it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I'm not really sure it's a "news flash" that these people aren't particularly "sharp".

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is like someone dying from COVID denying it on their deathbed.

You can't fix stupid.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My friend is a doctor and said that the number of people denying COVID is real while they died in the hospital is... significantly higher than 0.

It blew my mind that they could literally be hours away from death and still submitted it was a "liberal hoax". I just...can't.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

my colleague was one of these. We held a socially distanced ceremony at the office for him. Fucking bleak as hell.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I remember seeing something about a person telling the doctor to go to hell as they were being intubated and just thinking, "No, that'd be you."

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Evolution in action. Still sad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Wonder what was different about her abortion.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago

She's in the elite ruling class, so she gets to do whatever the fuck she wants with impunity while projecting false accusations onto anyone who fits in the 'other' category while her dumbass base of uneducated gerrymandered trolls eats it up.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

SHE needed one. That's the only reason. The answer was No for everyone else, but Yes for her. Nobody can kill babies but her.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 19 points 1 day ago

It was hers, as opposed to someone else's.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In all seriousness: it was an ectopic pregnancy, 5 weeks along. Technically legal to perform under Florida law, so in theory it shouldn't have been a problem to have it done even under current law.

To be clear, none of this is meant to be an enforcement of that law, any other laws about abortion on the books, or the anti-abortion movement in general. I can absolutely understand providers being skittish about anything even remotely borderline with these laws in place, just trying to get the basic facts into the comments because good arguments are worthless if it's about incorrect facts

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I can absolutely understand providers being skittish about anything even remotely borderline with these laws in place,

And that is the whole issue here in a nutshell. Doctors and nurses are putting their careers and freedom on the line just brushing up against these draconian laws. If I were in their shoes I too would be very skittish.

I'm neither a doctor nor a woman, but can they really draw a line saying this day is in the sixth week and tomorrow is in the seventh? A line that would hold up in court if it had to?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it's a matter of days you could probably just lie about the timing of your last period. Those weeks are calculated from the date of your last period, not from the date of conception, so as long as you're the only one who knows your cycle you could probably lie a little bit.

Which also makes a 5 week deadline more insane than most people realize. Given a steady 4 week cycle, you have 1 week to realize your period is late, schedule and perform an abortion. A lot of people do not have a steady cycle, and those may very well not notice until it's too late, even if they track their cycle.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago

Cruelty by design.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

The people who are setting the rules are VERY aware of ALL of that.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And is there any medical proof that can stand up to brainworm addled pseudoscience in court ? Would you bet your career and your freedom on that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dinren@discuss.online 36 points 1 day ago

No one is gonna arrest her for murdering a child because she couldn’t carry it to term?

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is why The Onion is so hard to differentiate from reality any more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

It's a shame she didn't die. Or at the very least learn something from this experience.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This really is a great example of being a special kind of stupid.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Yyp it's called retardedness. Idk why mods keep censoring me

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The mere idea that anyone has to perform a medical procedure on a pregnant woman relating to the pregnancy and hesitates, proves that the law is the issue.

Someone will undoubtedly try to get a bill passed somewhere that starts labeling any removal of a fetus from a woman as abortion when the medical community is telling you that is not the case. These anti-abortion supporters want woman to get pregnant and stay pregnant. They don’t care if you have medical complications that lead to death. To think they care is just a lost cause.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perfectly valid, until one of those that are making the rules and sentencing women to death by pregnancy are suddenly faced with it themselves. Then the hypocrisy starts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Blame democrats, blame democrats, there not even a real party anyway.

Honestly wish they'd have let her die and made it clear to her it was on behalf of what she fought for. Bitch doesn't deserve to doom so many women and live despite being a would-be victim of her own evil.

load more comments
view more: next ›