this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
278 points (92.6% liked)

Games

20191 readers
561 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm pretty sure this is the same guy who was ranting about Godot "being woke" last year lol

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, very smart and humble move, he certainly got hit with a ton of bad press for his opposition to the petition and that would have impacted the game studio's sales.

[–] chrischryse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So I’m confused what exactly did he dislike about the movement? Seems like a solid one to me.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

its difficult to know why he did what he did because he apparently misinterpreted what the point of the petition is and then spiraled right down a toilet from there

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

His defense of Godot and his stance on the attacks, seem very reasonable and correct: Clip 1, Clip 2. Nothing like what you remember, OP.

Separating from Off Brand Games to protect them of the fallout of his opinions and public exposure also seems like a correct decision.

Edit: fixed second link

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just a heads up, your two clips are linking to the same vid

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 hours ago

Oh thanks, the second clip is actually here. I'll fix it in parent in a minute.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you care about people caring?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 36 minutes ago

That doesn’t make sense

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

As far as I've seen, the only thing PirateSoftware did "wrong" was point out some unintentional consequences that would fall on indie developers given the language used in SKG as written, and get a bit personal in his criticism of Ross Scott, and everyone has lost their minds on the dude. Idgaf about personal beef between creators and I agree with his concerns for indie developers even though I still support the idea of SKG (there is a happy medium place to be found here). Even if I didn't, he's said nothing so inflammatory to the cause as to earn all this stupid drama. Chill the fuck out.

[–] TheOneAndOnlyDeath@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So "eat my entire ass" is not inflammatory now? Good to know.

Even of he did not say that, if he really wanted to give positive criticism he wouldn't advocate against it entirely. Your happy medium is correct, he was 100% against it from the beginning.

Not coming from anger or anything like that, just pointing out that you implied he was in the happy medium when he isn't.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

So "eat my entire ass" is not inflammatory now?

Do you have the clip/video source of this quote? I didn't see him say that in his critique videos I watched. I need context to judge it.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

No. Everything he said about this initiative was wrong

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Care to elaborate on what he said and how it was wrong? Or....

Edit: down voting someone asking for clarification does not make your side look better or more right, you know, guys. The guy essentially said "nuh uh" like that was a strong argument, and I said "because?". Seriously, chill out.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So he said it would force MPs to be able to be played single player. Which, is wrong.

In the stream/video he is on a page that litterly says "this is what its not about" and he says "so this is all what its about"

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Ok, I'll look more into that to better understand if that is the case. But even if he was wrong about everything, why is such a misunderstanding worth the drama and backlash? Everybody is truly up in arms over what seems like pretty mild criticism even if that criticism is all mistaken. Especially if it is all mistaken, really. People are acting like he said "fuck gamers/consumers and their rights", which is clearly not what happened. Disagreement isn't the same as disparagment or conflict. Reasonable minds can differ.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"Not only do I not support this, I will go out of my way to tell people not to"

"This initiative can eat my ass, the whole thing. It can eat my entire ass"

That's not mild criticism in my world. About something that he did not even understand in the first place as many things he complained about was things the initiative literally said they were NOT trying to do.

But hey. Sometimes people can be wrong. We make mistakes. But when someone refuses to acknowledge they were mistaken and instead double down.

That's when people get upset.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

"This initiative can eat my ass, the whole thing. It can eat my entire ass"

Do you have the clip/video source of this quote? I didn't see him say that in his critique videos I watched. I need context to judge it.

But at face value, I would still call that within the realms of normal criticism yes. He disagrees with the basis of the initiative. And disagreement doesn't mean that one or the other party is necessarily mistaken or that they are maliciously refusing to admit their mistake if unconvinced. They can just disagree. And even if they were being malicious or ignorant or too embarassed to admit their mistake, so what? Just don't engage, or argue in good faith. No need to swat the guy, make death threats, make weird personal attacks against him, or drag his name through the dirt across the entire internet because he is wrong or doesn't suck it up and tell you that you are right.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

People have been out for him since the WoW drama where he as a self proclaimed genius and WoW god did everything wrong and left his mates out to die.

They dug into him and found that he's a master at bullshitting and pretending to find solutions to puzzles, that he obviously did google.

He might be a furry and also changes his voice to sound more masculine. He claimed to have received tens of thousands of death threats after the wow drama, which is highly unlikely.

He never admit fault but always doubles down.

All of that combined brought out the biggest of hate boners in people.

It's definitely easy and justified to dislike him, but he's not Hitler or something. He's just unlikable for bullshitting all day, but doesn’t deserve real hate.

People don't do themselves a favour by having such a low bar for literally hating someone. They will just get controlled by their hate.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

People pointed out in his comments section but he did not apologize or mention for 10 months. When the video came out saying he was wrong he doubled down and said he is actually right. And then kept doubling down.

He also lied and said community is attacking him to see if that will hurt the movement. Community in fact did not attack him.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Again, not taking the "he's definitely wrong" stance at face value. I'll decide for myself. Reasonable people can disagree and both br "right" from their perspectives. Regardless, who gives a fuck if one person is wrong and doubles down on being wrong when they have no authority to stop this movement (clearly, as it has been quite successful regardless of his opinion). That shit happens 1 million times a day on the internet, and often from big names too. The facts is that, generally, he is an ally to the gaming community, particularly for indie gaming, and this is in-fighting bullshit.

He also lied and said community is attacking him to see if that will hurt the movement. Community in fact did not attack him.

They are attacking him now, here, publically dragging him through the dirt, and I've seen it elsewhere as well for the last week or two. What are you talking about? Why are we talking about him now if not becuase people are pissed off and hating on him? I read that someone even Swatted him.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yeah people take accountability tho. He did not say "oh sorry I did not read the slides where it specifically said the movement is NOT about what I thought." He just insisted he is right.

Also for the attacking part I wad referring to the accused reviewbombing of his studio/publisher. Sorry for not being clear.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago

Can you or someone share those slides, becuase I'm not seeing that either. I looked at the English language initiative text on the website on my lunch break and did not see them.

[–] Cossty@lemmy.world 112 points 23 hours ago

I don't like pirate software like any other guy, but I want to put credit where credit is due.

He wasn't ranting about Godot being woke last year. He was actually actively defending it from all the bigots. One of the very few YouTubers or streamers, I saw.

You have probably mistaken him with Asmongold. He has long hair too, and he is right wing nutjob pos.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

OP is mistaken. PirateSoftware defended Godot official and pointed out the actual perpetrator of hate was a mod of an unofficial fan discord. Someone else posted a clip of it in this thread.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 6 hours ago

That actually happened, but not from this PirateSoftware guy. The anti-woke godoters made their own fork, Redot, which, as you might have expected, doesn't do jack shit other than offering cosmetic changes

[–] ampy@discuss.online 10 points 16 hours ago

I guess they woke up and made a good open source game engine?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 27 points 22 hours ago

Wait, did PirateSoftware rant about wokeness, or are you confusing him with fellow failed game dev Grummz?

load more comments
view more: next ›