this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
203 points (98.6% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21834 readers
264 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wakest@piefed.social 61 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don’t know if anyone here realized this but the font in question here is made by Fredrick Brennan who is probably best known as the founder of 8chan

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i like… have complicated feelings on the guy. on the one hand, it's important to congratulate him on realizing the harm his actions did and working to undo all that. on the other he did years of harm that has yet to be undone and might never be undone. and everyone only gets so much grace. i'm glad he realized all his online friends were nazis and stopped hanging out with them, but on the other it's hard to trust the judgement of someone who hung out with nazis for years.

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it's definitely necessary to accept people who did bad things if they truly change and realize the problems they've caused. That applies not just to people who hang out with Nazis but also actual Nazis. When you get out of a far right group, you basically lose all your friends at once and if there's nothing else to go back to, it will make people think twice before going that step even if they're ready for it.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

100%

You were a nazi your whole life but now you’ve been fighting nazis for years, we gonna trash you or what? Definitely shouldn’t.

Welcome people to the light!

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Anything to do with Chomsky lol??

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Probably; seeing this font is giving me the urge to illegally bomb Cambodia

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How would one bomb Cambodia legally anyway?

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 10 points 4 days ago

You get the Supreme Court to give you a little piece of paper that says, "I can do what I want."

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

By having congress authorize it, hopefully with actual cause (dear god they don’t even need a good reason…)

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So, congress’s decisions counts as globally legal?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I never specified that I was talking about international law. That said, the Rome Statute didn’t exist back then and even if it did, it could be argued that “hot persuit” doctrine allowed it as it was Vietnamese forces that were the first to violate Cambodian sovereignty. I still think the bombing was completly morally repugnant and against the interests of both justice and US war goals, but I’m not sure it would qualify as a war crime.

Mai Lai on the other hand was a war crime, full stop.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 4 days ago

My Lai was a little worse than usual, but it was also pretty much the MO for American forces. Lt. Calley was just bloodthirsty enough to do it as an official operation, making enough of a gestalt to attract some attention, instead of just having a handful of people on patrol to do it and then come back to base and play cards after like nothing happened. And then again the next week, and then again the week after that.

Fashion brands celebrating rn (fuck you Nike)

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I mean it's clearly just a little joke (quite a good one IMO) based on the fact that it's a US-Constitution-like font.

The only question is whether the person who signed off on making this live was in on the joke. I suspect not, I think they probably thought "oh that's a weird name for a font."

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

My first thought was NYT font actually, it made me laugh quite a bit. I think the Chomsky reference is real.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 8 points 4 days ago

Oh.... holy shit. I think you're right. That's a much better joke.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To me it looks like the font for a Nazi-era newspaper headline.

Weird they all look the same, right?

[–] Penguin_1024@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 days ago

You're probably thinking of Blackletter, which was quite common in Germany.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackletter

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All of Google's fonts are manufacturing consent.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

google, as a corporation, has been pushing us all to move a particular way for years. it's most obvious in the YouTube recommendations algorithm which pushes right wing shit. their fonts platform just gives them more control over the entire web instead of just acting as an index.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Gothic ripoff?

damn why does it look fresh as hell though? wait is that the Washington Post logo font?