this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
139 points (98.6% liked)

Hacker News

2078 readers
380 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 42 points 3 days ago

Oh the class action should prove very entertaining.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Funnily enough my home has smoke detectors. No advanced algorithms just simple detection of smoke. I mean they are only designed to save lives not fine anybody, but I guess that's not what Hyatt are after.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 4 points 3 days ago

I suppose it’s looking at it like that is the same as the speedcam argument. Is it safety or revenue. At least you have some oversight and a due process when that’s wrong though.

I wonder if these people could contact the fire department as it has to be some kind of hazard giving false reports.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Trickle down scamming: Rest scams the hotel, the hotel scams the guests.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

£500 is excessive. And fighting guests over your scummy practice. Not on.

Hope a regulator steps in and looks at this but not hopeful.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is Amerikkka. The regulators exist to ensure that there are as many scams running as possible.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I'm not even sure the regulators exist at all anymore.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the regulators exist to ensure that businesses obey and pay the corrupt shitheads in government

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You are correct. Unfortunately in many sectors in the US that's not what's happening. Of course, it's not true across the board. There are exceptions, like the NTSB. But then the NTSB can only make recommendations, and it's enforcement counterparts, like the FAA, have no teeth. The FAA is now in essence run by the airlines the agency is supposed to regulate.

And until enough blood is spilled, this will continue

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i think you might have completely misread my comment, regulatory capture is intentional and symbiotic.

the regulators let the corporations poison the groundwater, and in turn the corporations give the regulators a rusty trombone.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah i did, I'm dumb sometimes

[–] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

What is the algorithm deciding? The person most likely to pay?