this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
907 points (99.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33469 readers
3828 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Kind of like how Republicans wamt to police your sexual partners. Pretty sad in this day of age. Who cares how people spend money and what they spend it on.

If you're so concerned about kids, launch a parental education campaign. Or age verify with the card.

If you're a parent, you shouldn't be attaching your payment methods to kids' accounts anyway. That's financial suicide.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You don't understand, I'm very concerned about the future for my child who I want to put no effort into raising. Why would I parent my kid when I can just have everything I don't want them exposed to banned? I'm a responsible parent who's definitely not just trying to enforce draconian puritanical standards I don't follow on everyone else.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Hands crying kid iPad so they can watch weirdly sexual AI videos of Elsa without stopping for 6 hours straight, because interacting with her is interrupting me binge watching “The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” which reminds me how puritanical I am

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Hmmm... That's a pretty valid argument. Now, normally, I'm not a big fan of hitting kids. So that's why I'm gonna hit you instead. Get over here, you little shit!

[–] Bhaelfur@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Won't somebody please think of the children?!

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Not like that!

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago

According to Knitting Cult Lady, cults always demand purity from its disciples, including those forced in (e.g. people raised in cults as kids), and there's an exception for the godhead-dude (who is often a lech).

It's not about children. It's about forcing obedience and virtue signalling. It's a nazi salute that shows to fellow party members you're one of them.

Real children's issues are about pulling kids out of precarity: food, housing, contact with family, education, healthcare, quality of life. Anyone who is saying their cause is to protect children who hasn't prioritized these specific things is engaging in a bad-faith argument.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hate it. Especially itch.io nuking everything. Adult games is basically the only reason I even had an account on there

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well thanks for letting me know I don't need to bother with that site /s

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think they're working on bringing a lot of it back and stuff, but ya know :3

Last I checked you couldn't search for anything with the "nsfw" tag

[–] chrislowles@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Not gonna lie their tag system sucks eggs, no way to exclude tags when searching on their site/app, I thought the site was nothing but horror when I first got into it.

[–] Booboofinget@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Funny part is that one of Jesus's favorite disciplines was a prostitute. I don't think Jesus was has as prudish as his followers are.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I get that it was a typo, and you meant to say "disciples", but I like it better this way.

Like Jesus was studying for a career in sex work.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone..."

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 3 days ago

Jesus always said the ones that needed him the most were the crooked ones. He say Magdalena and though "I can fix her"

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

Fuck you dollar jesus.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The time is now if you're looking to start your own payment system

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would be greatly entertained if valve went into payment processing and out-competed these absolute shitshows of companies.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 24 points 3 days ago

The Valve Strategy of "letting the competition shoot itself" spreads

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago

Oh, cool. A pity that it won't be adopted

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Does not work around the necessity to get all major retail banks or the central bank on board, as they outline in their FAQ.

There's no magic bullet, if you want to act as a payment processor you only have a handful of options:

  • Do a bank wire (but it's not pre-authorized so you're just providing a deposit account for your customers, like PayPal)
  • Use Visa/MC (which PayPal falls back to if you have no money in your deposit account)
  • Use regional payment processors where they exist (e.g. Bancontact/iDEAL in the Benelux, which Stripe conveniently abstracts for the retailers; however most countries don't have such a widespread alternative to American payment processors)
  • Use physical cash
  • Agree on a protocol to pre-authorize transfers on behalf of your customer with all banks your customers are likely to be using (in the EU you can do that with SEPA mandates, which PayPal does support as well)

In practice the EU is doing that last thing with Wero (which already has partnered with all major retail banks in Benelux+France+Germany) and Brazil successfully did the same with Pix. It's not that the technical part is particularly hard, it's that convincing the banking sector to adhere to and commercially promote a new standard is a long, expensive, arduous process that requires strong political connections.

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 2 points 3 days ago

You got Monero for starters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Society has never been able to keep NSFW content out of the hands of viewers / end users, and have tried multiple times. Singles (a The Sims -like with actual sex -- if kinda clinical; it was a German game) was pressured off shelves in Target, Gamestop and Electronics Boutique. It came back with underwear stapled on, which was quickly hacked off.

This is how we ended up with official / unofficial patches that re-unlock all the naked bits in games like Huniepop, Nude keys, nude codes and nude patches became the convention which ushered video games into the same perversity level of cinema. (We've already had countless fan-made nude patches for non-romantic games).

And of course they're going too far, pressuring distribution services to cut LGBT+ content whether it's porn or not. Before they were emboldened by Trump, there was already pressure to de-list specific themes (an incomplete list: rape/NC; fictional child sex abuse/child experimentation; incest; and depending on the assessment, furry content within a certain threshold.¹ ). Anyhow we know the white Christian nationalist movement (from which the Heritage Society's Project 2025 and the Seven Mountain Mandate come) is looking to criminalize porn and make it difficult to access.

1: This is still weird to me, enough to geek out about it here. Furry hate gets strangely specific. It breaks down like this:

  • Those who disapprove of all furry content that is adult-themed (contrast the 1983 movie Rock and Rule vs. 1973 Disney's Robin Hood ) this group probably only exists because there's a significant fanbase for furry porn / erotica.
  • Of those that remain, those who disapprove of furry content featuring explicit sex (e.g. "Omaha" the Cat Dancer first published in 1976, by Reed Waller and Kate Worley.)
  • Of those that remain, those who disapprove of furry content that is exclusively erotic (I can't find the specific ones I've read, which isn't many.)
  • Of those that remain, those who disapprove of erotic furry content that features species-accurate genitals, which is the threshold VISA was in, and is too spicy for some lemmings. I don't fully understand why this is a subcategory.

The thing is most porn games and most LGBT+ centric games are labors of love, first, and a revenue source second. They will get made and get out, more so, when entire demographics and communities are stripped of a voice or of acknowledgement. It also puts less spicy porn in the same category as unethically spicy porn (e.g. CSAM). If the public has to use the same methods as terrorists and child predators to get their fix, it makes those groups less illegitimate. In for a lamb, in for a sheep.

Anyhow useful websites are here:

[–] kartoffelsaft@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Of those that remain, those who disapprove of erotic furry content that features species-accurate genitals, which is the threshold VISA was in, and is too spicy for some lemmings. I don't fully understand why this is a subcategory.

This one actually makes the second most sense to me out of the ones listed (first being explicit sex of course). To a lot of people who aren't furries, at least in the horny sense, the emphasis put on making the genitals resemble those of real animals is a clear connection to bestiality. In order to care, you have to know, and to know you have to spend a lot of time looking at animal dicks (or spend time with people who do).

To make my point, ask yourself how you feel about other fetishes / kinks with similar properties. For example, consider ABDL. It's a fetish that uses fairly direct references to being way too young for sex despite being adults, much like the animal dicks directly invoking, well, sucking animal dick despite not being an animals. There are tons of people who see that and immediately think it's for pedos. Though, weirdly enough, many those same people don't have nearly that much of an issue with various more mild but more realized forms of neoteny in porn (the industry's obssession with 18-19yo girls springs to mind).

For what it's worth I'm not really in that group (consentual adults yada yada), but I did have that gut reaction when I first encountered it.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Firstly, I became sexually active in a sex-positive, kink-centric community, and so have been raised with the philosophy that so long as all participants are adults (and buts safety constraints on harm caused so no-one regularly has to go to the ER).

But I am unusually tolerant of unusual kinks and have jealousy issues of inclusion, rather than exclusivity. My psychologist a decade ago would attribute it to being neurospicy. Also during the Iraq war and the CIA extrajudicial detention and torture program, I freaked out and started a (personal) dive into moral philosophy, which explores the intersectionality (or rather the separation) between what we reason out is moral or proper (e.g. equality, liberty) and what we feel is moral or proper (e.g. purity, obedience)

One of the notable studies regards the story of Julie and Mark (in short, they're blood siblings, go on a camping trip, have sex and decide it was a good experience but not worth repeating) and subjects told this story would go to great lengths to rationalize their disapproval of the siblings' behavior in the story. This divergence between reasoned ethics and intuitive ethics runs thick through human culture, informing business practices like RTO mandates, bullshit jobs and crunching development teams (overworking them to meet deadlines, which kills their productivity to well below non-crunch levels)

So yes. People freak out about age play and lolicon, about Rule 34 featuring the Simpsons kids, about fictional bestiality, ...and about anthros with species-correct genitals, even if the characters are otherwise clearly consenting adults. Reasonably, these should all be protected by free speech, and efforts to limit speech always extend into non-sexual matters such as trans issues and queer culture, so that talking about UHaul Lesbians could soon become restricted or even criminal in the US.

I think species-correct genitalia and lolicon material should be legal and accepted as unrestricted content, but I also understand as a species, we will have to further develop our society so that it is less reactive to moral panics (also to political power consolidation) before marginalized content can be freely distributed, or, for that matter, all pervs and queers can come fully out of the closet.

And as a footnote, just as the autocratic purges come for the marginalized, the politically far-left and political enemies before cutting into larger demographics, autocratic censorship efforts come first for kink and queer content then general porn, then history and philosophy, and then language and grammar. Knitting Cult Lady, in her discussions of cult systems of control, discusses use of language to control the flock among her many topics.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What does Jesus need with my credit card information?

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

jim you dont ask the Almighty for his security numbers

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To the people who are pushing this:

Do you want everyone to start using crypto where all transactions are not controllable by you at all? Because this is how you get people to do that.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

That's the best case outcome no matter what, that's what crypto should be, not some brain rot hype scam fest. Also for private transactions, that's why Monero Is the only good crypto, its actually private and secure.

[–] omniman@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I want my wifu game back

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Just read about brazilian PIX system and I am baffled. Their gov bypassed payment companies all together and trump is really angry about it Lol. Epic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Couldn't people just by steam cards with cash, load load it to their accounts and then make their porn purchases? What's to stop other retailers from selling gift cards that can be purchased with cash to use on the pornographic stuff being sold? Edit: I just learned this issue stems from the major CC companies refusing to let companies like steam use their platform to process payments if they kept NSFW games up. My question still stands, what's keeping steam or the player base from telling these companies to f-off and switch to a cash based gift card method?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and then make their porn purchases

The issue goes far beyond "porn games on Steam". These same groups tried to ben other games with no sex at all, but "disturbing" themes (to them). They failed, because, big game, big pushback. But their agenda is not "no porn", it's "no anything we dislike". They're just starting with the thing they hoped would get little to no pushback for now.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Its really odd, cause you'd think they'd just want to make money no matter where it comes from.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

the only thing worth more than money to these kinds of people is making other people suffer.

load more comments (1 replies)

The biggest reason is Steam would likely lose more money from doing that compared with removing the games the card companies are being assholes about.

[–] seralth@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Gift cards only function because of payment processors basically.

If visa and MasterCard decide they won't support steam means you also can't buy steam gift cards with your debit card suddenly it requires cash.

Stores will get pressured to no longer stock those giftcard or also lose visa/MasterCard support. This has been threatened before and has caused gift cards to be removed from major grocery stores in the us in the past.

You CANT avoid this even swapping to crypto has the same problem. At some point you HAVE to deal with the payment processors.

Even just getting your crypto back out into cash can quickly become problematic for a business.

We the people have options and ways around it sure, but businesses really don't.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

See, I'm no fan of Bitcoin. It's pure speculation and hardly serves a purpose while burning down a rainforest for every transaction. Also the ledger makes things traceable, so it's also a worse concept than cash.

This, however, is a good example of why the concept exists. We need a financial tool outside of the control of banks.

(Yada yada Ethereum and proof of stake.)

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

It's also why American global hegemony is bad; they all tend to move in lock step with each other. If there were a few more European and Asian payment providers out there we'd be a bit more diversity of policy and true consumer choice.

Remember how they found comstock?

load more comments
view more: next ›