this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
703 points (93.9% liked)

Comic Strips

20033 readers
2722 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[dude with glasses in a communist t-shirt, arguing] I'm the only leftist here, your opinions are TRASH

[dude holding a theory book on smug, arguing] Read theory you losers, you're all WRONG

[dude in an anarchist hoodie, arguing] Nuh-uh, I'm the only leftist here, you're SHITLIBS

[the three dudes are now caught in a cartoon fight, glasses gone flying, punches everywhere, while a firing squad of nazis are targeting them with rifles]

[a confused nazi asks] Why… why are they still arguing?

https://thebad.website/comic/infighting

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alliswell33@lemmy.sdf.org 116 points 3 months ago (24 children)

The antidote to infighting in my experience is organizing in ideologically diverse spaces. I've organized with liberals and all types of different leftists. It has left me with the perspective that all these people are good people that just want better for the world. It's hard to get angry at them once you know them. Per usual the solution is to touch grass.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Grass is dangerous, specially if you have allergies. My advice is to never touch grass!

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 8 points 3 months ago

LOL as someone with significant autoimmune issues this rings to true.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The antidote to infighting in my experience is organizing in ideologically diverse spaces.

You are saying (correctly) that we need to organize in ways that appeal to more median voters, moderates, liberals and even conservatives around much broader initiatives that appeal to more populist ideas like wealth inequality, social programs to help poor neighborhoods, rebuilding infrastructure and creating more livable communities.

But people who read this are going to translate it as:

"They're saying I should reach out to the Green/Primitivist Anarchists I banned from my discord server" or "Maybe we should include the Orthodox Marxist–Leninists even though we hate them"

Or even worse: "HOW DARE HE SUGGEST I COMPROMISE WITH MY OPPRESSORS I WILL RIP THROATS OUT"

We all have to live next to each other even if we get the best policy results and I think everyone on either side forgets this. This isn't centerism, this is understanding that we have to rebuild together even if we don't share objective realities, we have no choice in the matter. I think too many people get stuck in their algorithmic ideology bubbles and think "the revolution/race war is coming, and everything will be great after."

Nobody is coming. Nobody is going to make it better. There is no secret cabal or underground movement, there will be no socialist revolution. What we see is what we get and if we want it better, we need to get a LOT better about getting our shitty emotions under control, learning to socialize and using our energy wisely.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 81 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It's why ranked choice is the only sane voting approach. First past the post heavily favors right wing authoritarians.

[–] Bad@jlai.lu 34 points 3 months ago

Hell yea I would love to vote for the people I actually want to vote for

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago (5 children)

“Voting is actually bad” Tankies 🤝 Nazis

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"My own entitlement and vindictive emotional state is far more important than broad policy measures to make the best outcomes for the most people." - Tankies 🤝 Nazis

edit: I will forever smirk that over a third of the people who read this felt "Well they don't understand that MY emotions are special, the unrealistic things I want are more important than any of those other things! How dare they equate my feelings with those of nazis, those creatures weren't even human, unlike me!"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago (14 children)

The only thing that matters is policy, I'll work with anyone as long as it's toward an egalitarian society with wealth redistribution.

Labels are nice for classifying, but not for executing. I don't care if you identify as leftist, or liberal, or progressive; I care if you support good policies.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The idea that all "leftists" should just work together is stupid.

Leninism, Anarcho-primitivism and Social democracy (for example) are not different approaches to "leftism" that ultimately want the same things; they are completely separate ideologies that naturally come into conflict. The people who follow them disagree with each other because they want and value completely different things. If they were to put aside their differences there would be nothing left.

That doesn't mean arguing on the internet about ideology is meaningful, or that there can't be common goals or enemies, just that you should give up the idea that all "leftists" are somehow natural allies, because it doesn't make any sense.

[–] Fjdybank@lemmy.ca 45 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I believe you are missing the forest for the trees. First, I acknowledge your examples are separate ideologies.

That concept also applies to the right... social conservatives, right-libertarians, and neoliberal ideologies are equally separate. However, those practitioners have no qualms about banding together to suppress dissent (or until such time they are the only voices).

Where the left leaning practitioners are unable to do so, they will be forever tyrannized by the banded majority.

To put it more succinctly, the enemy of my enemy is my friend (when freedom is on the line).

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

This. They act like they're giving up fringe beliefs to keep the consensus more left. It's isolating and alienating

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Draces@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm anti authoritarian and anti right. Tankies are leftists that I have no interest in getting along with. They are just as excited to be holding the gun in this comic

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 17 points 3 months ago

Yes, leninists are nominally on the left. Nominally. However throughout history most similar ideologies have consistently exterminated executed and oppressed everyone that ever disagreed with them. Allies or not. Left or right. Which makes them authoritarian and untrustworthy first. Left at their convenience.

As an anarchist, I have no major beef with actual communist. While I will disagree a lot with demsoc or socdems. I have no issue allying with them where we agree. Because even though we disagree, on the things we agree on. I know they are just as committed, and won't turn on us the moment it's convenient.

But I'm all too familiar with the type that behave like the comic. I think we all are. Anyone using the term shitlib or blue maga for instance.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly, all authoritarians (far left/far right) can suck a big fat one. They are always the best boot lickers.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 9 points 3 months ago

Yes, Unity cannot be enforced. Unity can only coexist with consent. And those that would violate consent to enforce Unity actually despise both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is what happens when hyper-individuality becomes a core of your (western) society. It’s also a byproduct that inadvertently benefits the ruling class. They want division and leftist pockets are already doing it themselves in a lot of cases. Purity tests can fracture communities and needlessly push away potential allies.

It’s why I tend to quote Fred Hampton often. He correctly understood that it was a working class versus ruling class situation and that arguing amongst ourselves was detrimental to organizing. It’s a vertical fight and horizontal attacks waste energy. You can still point out errors in what a comrade says. Criticism, self-criticism, and debate are all components of democratic centralism.

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (13 children)

The problem lies when one particular set of "leftists" thinks the best way foward is to have a literal capitalist state with a red flag and execute anyone who could even be a minimal obstacle to that.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

bLuE nO mAtTeR wHo unless it's an actual progressive 😮‍💨

[–] Zenjal@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

People, people, people, we can kill each other AFTER the fascist are gone, please and thank you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The People's Front of Judea vs the Judean People's Front

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think the premise here is flawed. It assumes infighting is the reason why we can't coalesce around a single candidate but the real reason why that isn't happening is because the DNC keeps backing right wing candidates who don't represent any of us. Too many people are under the false belief that being a Democratic politician makes one the "good guy" in the face of "evil Republicans" when in reality we've just been given two Republican candidates to choose from at the ballot box for quite some time now. They all work for the same masters and don't give a shit about fixing this broken country. They aren't two different sides, they're all on the same side against the American people.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It assumes infighting is the reason why we can't coalesce around a single candidate but the real reason why that isn't happening is because the DNC keeps backing right wing candidates who don't represent any of us.

That wouldn't really matter if we coalesced behind the candidates we want in the primary.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Except when the DNC doesn't like that candidate so they put their thumb on the scale to ensure they don't win. Why else do you think we keep getting the same handful of candidates? Clinton, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama, Obama, Clinton, Biden, Biden, Harris. Do you not see the pattern here? They want a dynasty in control not the people with the best ideas.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (5 children)

A thumb on the scale wouldn't really matter if we were united. They put their thumb on the scale with Mamdani and he won anyway.

Why else do you think we keep getting the same handful of candidates?

Because primary turnout is something like 15% of eligible voters, who are disproportionately old and "centrist".

Do you not see the pattern here? They want a dynasty in control not the people with the best ideas.

I'm not saying that this is false, I'm just saying it wouldn't matter if we quit the infighting, rallied behind a good prospect, and actually showed up to vote for them as the Democratic candidate.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bad@jlai.lu 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not from the USA and I'm tired of US politics 🥺

The current rise of the far right in my country started two decades ago, in part because of leftist infighting. I'm not going to point any fingers, I was guilty of infighting on that day too. It was so unexpected, nobody thought the far right could beat any of the leftist candidates… many lessons were learned that day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, pretty much this.

Going over the comments I already see boat loads of people completely missing the point where right wing extremism is taking hold thanks in part due to the constant bickering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Definitely more of a problem online where everyone is competing to be "right" as if there is any one actual answer.

Even empathetic people still want simple answers and are willing to be pretty cruel to protect theirs.

Oh also really funny comic, love the punchline timing. Can really feel it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't care what someone calls themselves as long as they oppose fascism and understand that the only place where Pedophiles are welcome is the inside of a wood chipper.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›